DarkMason

Flint

all of my family in the US can speak tagalog.

(5) Einstein

(2) BC Cougar

aah, no ranks

Also, 74 had surrounded us so we just decided to take them out before they could do so to us and 65 expod into our core after Lex got deleted by the game.

61 vs 65 & 74 lol.

@ V. Kemp

Still, calling atheism a religion isn't completely a correct way of using the definition of the word.

a

avogadro, how's atheism a religion when Buddhists (Buddhism: a religion) are atheist but always named seperately?
Atheism could be part of a religion (such as stated above), or just be part of a lack of religion, aka being "not-religious".

> V.Kemp wrote:

>Chickenwingz: If you wouldn't learn anything about me if a Christian destroyed the dome of the rock with a plane and I published a book with the Dome-less Jerusalem skyline on the cover (let's say for the sake of the example I was Christian) with a title like "Spreading Christianity in a Post-[date of dome attack] Jerusalem," then I don't think you're going to learn anything from anything I could reference, type, or link here.

He's learned better than to support Sharia by name in public anymore, but I wasn't seeking to mince words. It's like a politician telling you he's not going to raise your taxes, then arguing in court that what he's doing is raising taxes months later. Let's just call it what it is from the start. I'm not into word games.

The views of the people who want to build this mosque here are not a secret. It's obviously trolls we're responding to to have to point this out repeatedly. Everyone repeating that "they have the right!"  repeatedly ignores this. Nobody says they don't have the right. We're just saying there are plenty of legal ways to stop such a thing without removing their "right." They can keep their "right" to build a victory mosque and take it to the Nevada desert and exercise it there.

The only people trolling this topic are the people without the nerve to attack real human-rights abusers. They hate the US so blindly that they'd like to see it defeated by radical Muslim murderers who oppress, rape, and mutilate their peoples. They hate the US so much that it must be worse. They think victory mosque and they're immediately signed up with the radical liberals of the US who know they're lying but don't have the dignity to let that stop them from supporting what would be a victory for the US's enemies if only the US embarrasses itself enough to let it be built.

are you calling me a troll here? cuz i'm not trying to troll this discussion, actually presenting facts/quotes from reliable websites... which is something i haven't seen you doing.
Also, i would very well write such a book. You probably think the book would be about "conquering this part of the world after we have destroyed a monument in said part of the world", but instead the book probably is about "oh damn... we destroyed something very important to this part of the world, how should we live on in said part of the world now without having conflicts with the people from said part of the world?". Have you read the book? If you have, then maybe your arguement could be stronger than mine. If you have not however (neither have I), then why are you making such claims when, judging by the Imam's history, my description of the book is probably much closer to the truth without presenting evidence for your claims? and with evidence, i mean facts/quotes from reliable sources, so NOT vague websites that concentrate on only 1 issue or FOX News.

that latter part of your post "The only people... it be built." is just a personal attack, probably made because of lack of good arguements (the normal causes of such attacks).

so next time you post, please refrain yourself from making personal attacks, and PLEASE present some evidence for the claims you keep repeating instead of just repeating them over and over again. otherwise it'd seem to me that you, instead of these others, are the troll here.

thank you.

i just noticed this banner
This article needs attention from an expert on the subject. See the talk page for details. WikiProject Military history or the Military history Portal may be able to help recruit an expert. (December 2009)

but yeah, it's wikipedia so there's supposed to be loads of people editing it to near-perfection.

"Amin was known for his independent and nationalist inclinations, and was also seen by many as a ruthless leader. He has been accused of killing thousands of Afghan civilians. The Soviet Union looked at him as a threat for communism in Afghanistan and Soviet Central Asia. In December, 1979 Amin was assassinated by the Soviet soldiers killing Amin and his 200 guards."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghan_civil_war
^same war in which the soviet union was involved, except this one's time span continues up and till the present day situation.

Casualties and losses
Soviet:
14,453 Killed (total) [3]
9,511 killed in combat [3]
2,386 died from wounds [3]
2,556 died from disease and accidents [3]
53,753 Wounded [3]
311 Missing

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan

total of 14453 russians killed and 53753 wounded, so yeah, they killed more than 3000 russians in 1978.