I'm 100% wrong because you can't google and click the first half dozen results? I'm sorry you don't know any decent news media sources to reference and find out what's going on. Please take note of your level of awareness.

"Why Obama Wants Control of the Census "
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123423384887066377.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
- - - - -

President Obama said in his inaugural address that he planned to "restore science to its rightful place" in government. That's a worthy goal. But statisticians at the Commerce Department didn't think it would mean having the director of next year's Census report directly to the White House rather than to the Commerce secretary, as is customary. "There's only one reason to have that high level of White House involvement," a career professional at the Census Bureau tells me. "And it's called politics, not science."

The decision was made last week after California Rep. Barbara Lee, chair of the Congressional Black Caucus, and Hispanic groups complained to the White House that Judd Gregg, the Republican senator from New Hampshire slated to head Commerce, couldn't be trusted to conduct a complete Census. The National Association of Latino Officials said it had "serious questions about his willingness to ensure that the 2010 Census produces the most accurate possible count."

- - - - -
Funny how the guy who doesn't estimate/sample is the guy who can't give accurate numbers; it's the ones who have no problem making up numbers who we should depend on!

"Obama shifts Census oversight, triggering angry protest by Republicans"
http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=41986&dcn=todaysnews
- - - - -

The move would shift the chain of command with the bureau and the Commerce Department, where the bureau currently resides. It comes after the Congressional Black Caucus, National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials and other groups expressed displeasure with Obama's nominee for Commerce secretary, Republican Sen. Judd Gregg of New Hampshire.

- - - - -
So he's not just a hypocrite when he talks about transparency, but also when he talks about bipartisanship.
- - - - -

Gregg, the groups said this week, opposed efforts to secure emergency funding for the 2000 Census, which they asserted exposes a potential lack of commitment to ensuring that hard-to-reach minority populations are properly accounted for in the 2010 census.
A White House spokesman confirmed Thursday that Obama plans to work closely with the bureau, which will remain within the Commerce Department.

- - - - -
Oh he'll make sure they're counted. Or not "counted," certainly not, but a bigger than accurate number will be given to them to ensure that they are represented!

I'm sure I could find more sources. Some of you are having trouble. My advice is, just don't vote or post if you have no idea what's going on.

I have studied this for about 5 years now, and I can say there is no millions and billions in the proofs that can be examined and called anywhere near accurate!

Your covering again for your immaturity. How old are you, no insult meant, but meant to help you understand that there are things you should not claim without reading in full the opposite side's views (Something I do, but others do not)