sKoE )= wrote:

>> So the government (or corrupt people in it) reached out to these pathetic excuses for black men and set them up with drugs and weapons to deal throughout the community.

Did these 'black men' wander around with AK-47s in the 70s?

Fact is, that you call yourself African American, implying you are not really a normal american. Just state that you are "American" without the Africa before. Dont generalise yourself to much. The white Americans dont call themself European Americans, do they?

Weapons and a vide variety of drugs are available in my community. But nobody shoots anyone. Rarely is a kid dumb enough to do anything more than drink a few beers and smoke a few joints. It must sound so enlightening to hear yourself talk about the US government providing drugs, weapons, and HIV infected prostitutes to poor blacks as a part of their organized master plan. But these things are available to everyone in and around these areas. They PAY for them. Who buys weapons and uses them in crimes is not determined by government weapons giveaways. If you have any evidence of these do provide it. Who contracts HIV is not determined by government [HIV+]whore giveaways. If you have any evidence of these do provide it. Who is addicted to crack, heroin or anything else is not determined by government drug giveaways. If you have any evidence of these do provide it.

It's a solid story. It presumes so many facts with 0 evidence that that's all it is.

Nobody is making anyone buy a weapon and become a murderer. Nobody is making anyone purchase crack and become a crackhead. Nobody is making anyone have sex with random whores and get AIDS. Tell whatever stories you want; the problem is not the availability of guns, drugs, or STDs. These things are all available in any area despite the best and most expensive efforts a government can take to stop them. To propose that a nanny government is needed to save poor blacks from guns, drugs, and STDs is insulting. It's insulting because it perpetually portrays them as victims of their inferiority. It's additionally insulting to their intelligence because it proposes to "solve" a problem which is supposedly cause BY the presense of guns, drugs, and STDs with measures which do not remove guns, drugs, or STDs from any community. The solution does not match the problem, and the problem has been misidentified to begin with.

The availability of guns, drugs, and STDs do not lead to the problems discussed here (many here attributing the availability of these things to direct government action aimed at oppression of poor blacks). These things are available to virtually all communities, despite any and all government restrictions and bans. If any community has irregularly large problems with these things it is not a result of availability. If the price of a firearm or drug dropped in price to 50% or 25% because Uncle Sam wanted to oppress most communities I've ever known or been a part of, the impact would be minimal if there was any impact at all. The price of a gun is nothing near the difference between a decent person and one who will mug/rob/murder. The price of a drug is far less than the difference between a relatively functional, healthy human being and one who smokes crack like its their job and steals and robs to support their habbit.

Regardless of the claim of government responsibility for the availability of all of these things in certain communities (would love all the evidence we can find), to claim that availability is the absolute/real/most significant source of the problem is just fallacious reasoning. I'll be blunt; it's a lie.

"But yes, the government did poor crack cocaine into the poor black communities. "

Baloney.  Why arent' you on crack then?

Why can't everybody else do what you do?

It's still handguns and shotguns btw, AKs are a comparative rarity

The victims of inner city crime are not the poor fricking Crips who shoot kids as part of their initiation, it's the kids being shot

and RIGHT NOW, 2009 black men in LA are more likely to be killed by illegal immigrant drug dealers on orders from imprisoned Mexican mafioso who decree 1 black man SOMEWHERE be killed for every dead mexican drug dealer....and then Mexicans die randomly on the same principle. Only taht shit is too hot for LA county and city authorities to handle

so what your saying is some "higher power" is scheming to irradicate your race through means of AK 47's and Crack cocaine...

news flash any race can get their hands on them and start killing themselves they just chose not to.
its not our fault 50cent tells your youth that 8 bullets to the face is cool.
stop glorifying gangsters and letting 3 year old girls Krump.

and maybe they wont be pregnant by 13 and have time to raise proper children at a proper age.

basically you behave based upon how you were brought up and raised.

i would never do crack nor would i shoot some 1 with an AK, but that being said my mother wasn't a 13 year old pro krumer so take from that what you will.

good day.

You were asked what Obama would do and you replied that all he can do is set an example, Chamelio Salamander. I questioned if that is all a President is supposed to do. I questioned the kind of example he sets, giving examples of his behavior that I do not believe set a good example for anyone.

I'm sorry that I'm not remotely intelligent. Maybe if I just said everything that has content was a mindless rant and not remotely intelligent I'd be a brighter person. That doesn't answer the question of whether Obama is supposed to do more than set an example as President of the USA or calm my questions about his morally objectionable actions (which people who are good examples tend not to have loads of), but I guess I just don't operate on this elite level that you do.

He's your nigga? He's mixed race. Lil light skinned for my area. I think I'll call him whitey from now on for trying too hard and denying his heritage. That's some shameful stuff, that.

He'll do nothing but set an example? That's his job as President? What's his example? Marry rich? Make friends with bombers if it is politically expedient? Go to a racist church that teaches you to be a victim if it is politically expedient? Deny that one of your parents is white and that's the one that raised you because an ignorant audience will ignore this if you're mixed race and own your blackness?