1,351

(7 replies, posted in General)

> ☭ Fokker wrote:

> She looks WESTERN. That's the point! A growing number of asian "beauty" gurus are telling girls that if they want to be attractive they have to remove their racial characteristics.

LOVE YOUR BODY
on our terms>

So? If women want to look Western, that's up to them.

1,352

(7 replies, posted in General)

Why?

She looks much hotter when she's finished.

1,353

(52 replies, posted in General)

> [TI] Primo wrote:

> a 6 - 6.5 i'd say... on 10>

I agree, on her looks. Although, I rate her higher because I just love her voice haha.

1,354

(52 replies, posted in General)

If you are a guy, rate this girl on a scale of 1-10 for attractiveness. I'm especially interested in Avo's rating, since he rates many celebrities who are considered hot rather low. For example, he rated Avril Lavigne a 5.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXA6VbQSOPc&feature=channel

I consider her a 7 and possibly an 8.

1,355

(42 replies, posted in Politics)

Schniepel,

Western nations may praise Human Rights, but they have only enforced and reported them when it was politically convenient. Behind the scenes, no Western country is driven by values like justice. Their actions instead suggest that they are driven by wealth and power, and they will violate their values when they have to.

Not only is this the way that politics works and has always worked, it isn't going to change either. No matter how hard someone who exercises great political power tries to respect human rights, at some point they will have to violate them to get that power and maintain it. If you want it and you want to keep it, you must be willing to be ruthless when the situation demands it. That is why, as the saying goes, those who want power must sell their souls - it's because they need to compromise their principles.

This is why nothing will ever change. Human rights is eventually at odds with power. A revolution can remove a wanton brute or an imbecile from power, but it can not change this demand inherent to power. Moreover, the free media isn't doing anything, now is it? If it ever threatened the elite, they could just as easily regulate it.

In summary, it may not be right or fair, but I have better things to do with my life than change human nature.

1,356

(42 replies, posted in Politics)

> Red_Rooster wrote:

> Dont you know? powerful countries never commit warcrimes. might is always right i guess.>

Thank you for educating the overly idealistic Firewing on how politics works.

1,357

(42 replies, posted in Politics)

Get real.

There is no hell, and War Crimes are a matter of political propaganda.

1,358

(15 replies, posted in General)

It would be awesome if on July 30th the following people also mysteriously died.

1. Barrack Obama
2. Joe Biden
3. Nancy Pelosi
4. Robert Byrd

The world would be saved!

1,359

(7 replies, posted in General)

> Morbo the Annihilator wrote:
What about the other 18 minutes?>

Good morning biatch!

1,360

(7 replies, posted in General)

> Morbo the Annihilator wrote:

> People that sleep more then 8 hours a day generally die younger.>

LOL. I owed a sleep debt to my body from the night before. I usually get 7 hours.

1,361

(7 replies, posted in General)

I just woke up. It's 12:18 am and I went to bed at 3:00 pm.

1,362

(16 replies, posted in Politics)

> Red_Rooster wrote:
okay i guess u want me to explain how stock analysts are different from christian preachers... if it is not obvious enough.

Okay first off, like i said, religion is only a collection of BELIEFS. Not much facts involved here. But people who are trying to scam people through stocks usually provide false "facts" which are lies to mislead the public. Now Christianity, like all religions, only preaches its beliefs to other people and if they believe they will give. Have you ever thought that maybe these people are happy in giving even if they dont recieve ten fold in money? Have you even considered that people give in hopes that they will recieve other blessings from their god. >

A pyramid scam is not disqualified from being a pyramid scam because it's intertwined in to religion. A religious pyramid scam is still a pyramid scam, and all your talk about the differences between a businessman and preacher are absolutely irrelevant.

<If you can provide one youtube video of a televangelist saying that you will recieve back whatever you give in money then I accept defeat.>

Thank you for saying something relevant. Here

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlbWSvrZ27g

1,363

(16 replies, posted in Politics)

All you have to do is listen to popular Televangelists like John Piper and Joel Osteen.

Of course, they don't represent the majority of Christians, but it's nonetheless a scam.

1,364

(16 replies, posted in Politics)

> Red_Rooster wrote:

> Maybe you are forgetting that religion is just a collection of beliefs. You are trying to equate the bible to wall street financial analysts. It is not the same. If you want to know the difference I will gladly help you out smile

If I believe that I will get a return 10 fold what I give to the church, then it is my belief and no one can/should stop me.>

Don't put words in my mouth. The bottom line is that if you tell investors that they will receive a return 10 fold and the empirical evidence suggests only a loss in 90%+ of the cases, then it is definitely counted as a pyramid scam. Whether it's a religion that is advertising that is irrelevant. It's a pyramid scam, period.

1,365

(102 replies, posted in General)

Finally.

1,366

(16 replies, posted in Politics)

> Red_Rooster wrote:

> Why does it bother you how other people spend their money? If you don't like it then dont do it lol. I think you have given huge amounts of money to the church in the past and havent received anything. Thats why your so cranky.>

This isn't tithing or donating. It's a ponzi scam. Telling people they will receive a return on their investment when the evidence says otherwise is outright fraud.


Yell,

Haha. Yes, I agree. They deserve prison time too rofl.

1,367

(16 replies, posted in Politics)

Why haven't the American preachers who preach this been imprisoned for operating a ponzi scheme yet? The empirical evidence shows that there is no relation between investing in to a church and receiving a financial return. Investing in a church is not an asset that appreciates in value, rather it's scamming stupid and subservient religious people of their money.

As little as I respect the idiots who buy in to the scam, I think the kingpins who are operating it need to be arrested for operating a pyramid scheme. The sad part is that enforcing the ponzi scam laws would imprison a lot of the elites in the religious right, which is where they belong so they can't harm anyone rofl.

1,368

(25 replies, posted in Politics)

> Chris_Balsz wrote:

> Without australia where would the commonwealth get its testosterone?

US is gonna kill growth and production and print money like it don't matter. So we won't count for a hundred years again>

The US will be part of the second Roman Empire by then. haha

1,369

(25 replies, posted in Politics)

I think that in the future, Western countries will start to become closer and more politically and economically unified, even the US, before one of the BRIC countries pose a serious challenge. I include the US because the Evangelical right is finished. Atheism/Agnosticism is also on the rise in the US, having more than doubled in the past 15 years. If a right has any hope for success in the future, it will have to have moderate views on social issues and be focused on the free-market. The only question is Aussie, you never know where their loyalties lie. One day it could be to the West and another day to Asia.

But still, with or without Aussie, a Western political unit would be down right invincible. The US is less than half the GDP of the West.

1,370

(25 replies, posted in Politics)

rofl and Brazil.

1,371

(126 replies, posted in General)

> Han wrote:

> You havent noticed the increase in MMA, WEC, UFC and the rest of modern day gladiator fights?

Tank away the tap out and its there.>

Yes but they are professionals and there isn't death.

I want to see criminals and hipsters fighting one another to the death. It's a form of population control. A few can be burned or eaten by lions. We can see the professional fighters later as the main event, and ofc there shouldn't be much killing among the professionals. They're too expensive.

1,372

(36 replies, posted in Politics)

> ..Nemeara.. wrote:

> hipsters:
http://www.damnilikethat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/pink-hipster-panties.jpg
http://www.bubbleroom.se/produkt/miss-sixty/22159/brooklyn-hipster-black.aspx
http://www1.macys.com/search/index.ognc?SearchTarget=*&Keyword=hipster>

Lol. That doesn't count.

1,373

(126 replies, posted in General)

Who cares about sports anyway?

What we need are gladiatorial fights. It would be a great way to reduce the size of the hipster population, all in the name of entertainment.

1,374

(126 replies, posted in General)

I told him all about Ronald Reagan Jr, and he cried.

1,375

(126 replies, posted in General)

The most popular sport in the US is definitely not Soccer.