You only imagine Chomsky says that because it affirms a larger patriarchy of self.

Actually that should read "understand" instead of imagine. One subjectively understands the text. And the text gets an active verb because the text does things; it affirms or recapitulates or asserts. And the direct object of the text's action is a hierarchy of some sort. One must always orient one's understanding of a text's action to some social system  And the hierarchy should be described obliquely so that the audience can more easily impose its own understanding in agreement

Thus "you understood chomsky to say that because he affirms a larger patriarchy of self". What does that mean? Its truth cannot be challenged without refuting the patriarchy of self and thats impossible because you the messenger dont know what it is. It could be Chomsky has been affirming a patriarchy of self all his life on purpose,or  in fact he might do it unwillingly. So asking him does no good at all.

Wrong: "The dog bit the man"

Right: "A dog was seen to revolt against the tyranny of sentience."

My friends own illegal guns

And one time going to vegas they blew through a speed trap at 100 mph, outran the cops at 150 mph, got off the 15 in Baker and spent 6 hrs at a McDonalds waiting for the CHP to stop prowling the side streets

Doop try going into Belgium and hook up with WFS he wants to get arrested. Go to France and torch a car, they expect that

Dr Phil Chapman...The geophysicist and former NASA astronaut"

"We get a seasonal shift for one year and based on that one year enough evidence has been gathered to support a claim that we hare heading towards an Ice Age?"

no, aren't you aware that many climatologists said we were heading into an Ice Age thirty years ago?

"Fokker, they WANT to belive it, so any claim by anyone makes them certain that they are correct. And this no matter who it is. Weird people as I said."

Doesn't that also apply to all ecology minded people who don't have a PHd?

"I tupped a guy getting money from an ATM."

irl?

i get PAID to type gud

Shite out of luck

Chelsea will join Manchester United in the first ever all-England Champions League final. Chelsea took out Liverpool yesterday in a thrilling 3-2 overtime victory (4-3 on aggregrate). Didier Drogba scored two goals and was a constant menace, proving he's not just a diver, as Liverpool's manager Rafi Benitez has suggested. Frank Lampard, playing despite the death last week of his mother, smashed home a penalty kick in overtime and contributed to Drogba's first goal with a defense-splitting pass, one of several he delivered.

As I pleased as I was to see Liverpool lose, I was happier to see three goals in overtime. So often the extra period ends with no scoring, and we wind up with penalty kicks. It's a credit to both sides that they saved some of their best football for the extra 30 minutes.

There are those, and I'm one of them, who like to complain about how lucky Liverpool is. And the Shite certainly rode a fair amount of luck to get past Arsenal and into the semi-finals. But the real reason for Liverpool's success in Europe over the years is the team's refusal to be intimidated in big games before hostile crowds and its unwillingness ever to give up. Both qualities were amply on display yesterday. Thus, a club that has been unable for years to score at Chelsea's home fortress put in two yesterday, both in response to Chelsea taking the lead. In fact, Liverpool dominated the second half.

As for Chelsea, one would think that yesterday's victory, coupled with Saturday's win over Manchester United that pulled the club level on points with Man U, would serve as vindication for much-maligned Israeli manager Avram Grant. But despite the fact that Grant has succeeded where his revered predecessor Jose Mourninho failed (to get past Liverpool and into the Champions League final), Mourinho's predecessor Claudio Ranieri may well be right in predicting that Chelsea must defeat Man U in Moscow for Grant to keep his job.
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/05/020420.php

once again I have no clue what he's on about but it sounds involved

Many of our astronauts are ph.ds so they understand what data they're getting

We sent geologists to the moon and they're astronauts now

Term just means they've been in space. They apply expertise to fields like robotics and meteorology and nutrition

Most our astronauts aren't pilots or engineers of the spacecraft

Shame on all of you. Why dont you put the game controller down and go out into the fresh air and sunshine and really shoot people. I bet there's a park right near your house!  Just stand in the grass and see all the interlocking fields of fire in lines of gold crossing the field like matrix code. Is that really air youre breathing? Strange beautiful with grass of green. Shiny beautiful perfect.

trump tries to copyright "You're fired"
Now you claim "weanies"
There must be radon in your ground water

Now WE drink reclaimed sewage like the Fremen

Irl doe they charge more to do a limit order?  Also is it universally illegal to give VIPs trading priority on etrades like NASDAQ got caught doing last decade?

We must commit NOW to sustained submarine fusion explosions at the poles to melt the ice caps!

Since he's a yank that pretty much leaves him out of both the global and aussie community

Btw love that "outraged" spasm: "yes its cool! But it's a WARM cool!"

Hi

I saw the DUTCH ONLY sign outside and I knew Americans would be welcome because Holland is so friendly

Are you serving lunch?