1,126

(1,845 replies, posted in Universal News)

"If I had had the place they started off with I would have had one goal and one only simply control sec 4 and kick everyone else out and have all the planets to myself and not even waste time going into any other sec"

and how boring a round you would have had lol

1,127

(1,845 replies, posted in Universal News)

i also said that cancel wars against smaller farms were inevitably just farming tongue

1,128

(1,845 replies, posted in Universal News)

shush iv been revising for 3 days solidly and had an exam today my grammar and english can go suck my balls tongue

or maybe this tongue

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popemobile

pretty much any james bond aston martin tongue

y not post in the premium gal forum then?

1,132

(59 replies, posted in Community)

*jumps up down in joy*

nah im just kidding tongue

cya tymo

1,133

(27 replies, posted in Drafting)

flint does have a sound mind when it comes to eco, but you cant call his strats good and ruined only by the human factor. when you make a strat, you already know that you will be working with humans tongue thats why you must never plan too far ahead, becos you just feel like crap when it doesnt work out the way you wanted, and you feel like your fam is doing awfully.

1,134

(24 replies, posted in Universal News)

wot i said still stands Trex, the smaller and thinner the fam the fewer planets you should be taking from them in total, and thus the total amount of morale you lose is equal to taking more planets from a bigger fam.

1,135

(1,845 replies, posted in Universal News)

imo only the bottom 5 fams should be off limits to the top 5/6 fams for any kind of war (there is a big nw and planet drop at 15-16).

however nap cancellation wars against fams 10-15 seem kinda harsh becos it gives them little to no chance. tick wars seem ok to me

1,136

(1,845 replies, posted in Universal News)

not just that, if you nap at the end of war and want to trade out systems so ur not sharing with the fam u just warred, you're not allowed to say 'gimme those systems and ill give you these'

it's stupid.

and what did artic do gondor? he kept msging me to ally but tht was for an official alliance. i didnt see anything illegal.

1,137

(585 replies, posted in Community)

exams :'(

1,138

(1,845 replies, posted in Universal News)

well when i have a bit more time tomorrow i will go to chat and argue the crap out of them tongue

1,139

(1,845 replies, posted in Universal News)

yes but KT's post in announcements states that ALL planet trades outside allies and your own fam are illegal, which is total bullocks and its never been that way -.-

1,140

(1,845 replies, posted in Universal News)

wtf planet trades are not illegal. they never have been. they are only illegal if you tell the defending family that you want them to fight a certain family, or you ask them to search for planets near a specific fam. never before has a mod said that regular planet trades are illegal. im 100% sure of it

1,141

(180 replies, posted in Universal News)

i only remember two of them from sd

and yes i know sokke but again, havnt seen him around here for ages.

1,142

(180 replies, posted in Universal News)

"Which ones exactly Arch ? Dispo, TNT, Frosty, Lord Satan, Damon,  Lund, Airwing, Zeuz, Annabanana, Robomaster, Masterfreak or idk...who were you aiming at"

dispo doesnt play anymore, neither does TNT, i havnt seen frosty in ages but he wasnt all that gd, satan is too inactive, i love damon but he was a lil' overrated, lund isnt that active these days, airwing has left ic cos of rl problems, zeuz i havnt seen in age, never heard of annabanana, robomaster i havnt seen around in ages.

that leaves noir, masterfreak and sum inactives.

good luck tongue

1,143

(180 replies, posted in Universal News)

pfft, the other norwegians suck tongue

1,144

(180 replies, posted in Universal News)

i like jet's idea.

though i dont like many other english players tongue

1,145

(24 replies, posted in Universal News)

sorry trex, but if you're making enough attacks that you need to declare war to save morale, then its ffarming. ppl who say 'im declaring war but its not a war' are talking total bullocks. war declarations exist so that large amounts of attacks(ie - a war) can be done for minimal morale loss. that's their entire point. if you didnt need to make that many attacks against a fam, then you wouldnt need to declare war.

1,146

(15 replies, posted in Universal News)

in the expolration phase you often have core clauses, whereby each fam is not allowed to explore into the other fam's core.

in 1on1 naps it is also quite common to find ally clauses which dictate that should your ally be attacked 2vs1 by the napped fam and his or her ally, you may void the nap with no cancellation time.

1,147

(27 replies, posted in Drafting)

as you can see he's also very modest tongue

1,148

(1,845 replies, posted in Universal News)

daffodils for the win

1,149

(1,845 replies, posted in Universal News)

arent all daisys the same colour? white petals with a yellow centre...?

and if they(you?) had wanted dimpel's pop lower than that you could have got it lower easily enough tongue you only cast 2 hypnos on him lol. besides, wot use would lowering his nw be to you now that you've already built? wink

1,150

(1,845 replies, posted in Universal News)

would u prefer it if we talked about daisys?

uni news is only interesting becos of arguments

and 59 dropped their pop banker, probably themselves, 38mil pop and 1.8mil nw. can anyone tell me how much nw he lost from things that werent pop and then have a guess at wot those things were? tongue