There are no "rights" in socialism that workers can claim against their government
Banks are finding that out right now
Under Bush the banks were given an offer they could not refuse, literally. Bush's Treasury Secretary ordered them to accept loans they didn't want. Paulson told them in writing that if they refused, bank regulators at the Fed would order it anyway and if they just "volunteered" Treasury would announce they were a solvent bank. So any holdouts would NOT be declared solvent and would be publicly ordered to get $$$ by the "independent" regulator, and guess what happens to the stock of a bank in that mess?
Paulson's letter has been published under the Freedom of Information Act by a bunch of wingers who won't roll over
Now Paulson's Asst, Geitner, holds the chair and refuses to let banks pay off these loans, orders them to borrow more, and wants to control who sits on their boards.
Sadly for the Washington Gang we do not have a socialist constitution and if it were worth the trouble--and its headed that way-- a bank can sue the govt to force the govt to accept a payoff or void the debt.
Under socialism there's no basis to complain, the govt is supposed to coordinate the market ignoring the best interests of the immediate players.