Yes, it's freedom for a woman to be sheltered from the world and homeschooled by her parents, and taught that God commands her to serve her husband and one day give birth to lots of babies.

Freedom... for her pimp father.

It would be one thing if parents homeschooled because the state sucked at it. However, it is because they don't want their children exposed to those sinners who teach sex ed and so on. To me, that looks like tyranny of the parent over their child.

Finally, it is conservative and business lobbies that are cutting classes that nurture critical thinking. No doubt, it's because they want good worker drones who don't question authority.

So, if you want children to question authority and learn civic virtue and critical thinking, parents aren't going to teach it to them.

Radical feminists call Femen "fun feminists," as in they shouldn't be taken seriously, lol.

It's funny how they said violence solves nothing, except it does, even if you lose.

I think Kemp is saying that aggressively fighting terrorists abroad fails to solve the problem. The problem is that the U.S. government has been funding, training and arming terrorist organizations to achieve minor political victories, only to have them later turn on us. So as long as we continue to support terrorist organizations, we will never win the war on terror.

And, I suppose he believes that fighting the terrorists makes the problem worse, or that ceasing our meddling would be sufficient.

I don't see what's so contradictory about fighting mercenaries when they fight you, or in funding them when they fight for you.

I say we give Turkey, Jordan and Israel permission to partition Syria between themselves. It would be a strategic victory in the region at little cost, and it would deprive Russia and Iran of a key ally.

But unfortunately, that will never happen because Obama cares more about "convincing" other nations that he's a nice guy rather than do what's in America's best interest.

She usually calls your work place

An effective solution to the exploitation in prostitution would include the policies below:
1. Decriminalize the sale and purchase of sex
2. Decriminalize the purchase, possession and consumption of most recreational drugs
3. Provide a robust job education, counseling and drug treatment program

So background checks are identity theft? heh.

I hope you know this from research that doesn't include radical feminists or religious organizations.

Kemp,

Except, I am skeptical about the number of women going to black market pimps. My understanding of the business is that prostitutes generally arrange appointments online. They use a service that advertises themselves as an escort, and men either call or email them. Then they request your name, number (if they don't have it), and place of work. They use this information to verify a client's identity and do a background check. They may also request references from other prostitutes. Alternatively, prostitutes are also creating services that do the background checks for them, and clients pay a monthly fee to be white listed by the service. On the client side, there are reviews of prostitutes so clients can verify if prostitute is legit or not.

Finally, there is no way that the internet has not lead to the disintermediation of prostitution. The barriers to entry are low, and despite the failures of law enforcement, the market has mechanisms in place to protect both prostitutes and clients.