"I don't know what the security forces were, I don't know what exactly the ambassador told his superiors, I will assume neither the ambassador is a martyr who doesn't mind dying for his country not the central government is happy to see officials die. I do not think trying to pin yet another thing on Obama is a valid argument in this case."

You just acknowledged that the central government doesn't want to see its officials die, so you're acknowledging that they're inept. Every report makes this clear. Every rumor suggests it's even worse than we know.

Since you obviously disagree, please share with us your security expertise. In your expert opinion, the warnings were rightly ignored? In your expert opinion, security was sufficient? It's dumb to even think of trying to argue what you're suggesting (that the Obama administration wasn't massively incompetent). No wonder you just make claims but don't bother trying to back them up.

"The distinction is you have alot more control and possibility to prevent an attack on your own soil, rather than an embassy on some forsaken place in the middle of a muslim state. Unless you wanted the US army to occupy all the surrounding areas of every US embassy in the Middle East. Do you?"

The USA is still a mostly free nation. It doesn't track all of its citizens and their actions. Comparing the WTC 9/11 attacks to this recent embassy attack is apples, oranges, and stupid.

Please remove the spam, venerable moderators.

Justinian I,

Unless he's stated where he draws the line between where he moves the nation at every opportunity and where his desired collectivism ends, you're just wasting our time with meaningless equivocation.

Unless you can tell us how his views differ from communism, you're just spamming. That he wasn't able to get single payer passed doesn't make him not a communist. That he knows better than to propose state ownership and control of anything (which he couldn't get at this time) doesn't make him not a communist. He's certainly pushed for as much state ownership and control as he could hope to achieve.

I've pointed out that he pushes absolutely everything in the direction of communism/socialism/statism. Banks. Healthcare. Local pensions. Various industries, from automotive to crony "green" companies. Everything he does moves in the direction that a communist/socialist/statist/fascist would want.

Sure, this doesn't _prove_ that he must absolutely be a communist beyond a shadow of a doubt, but it raises questions. And if you can't tell us how his ideologies differ from communism/socialism/statism, you're not exactly putting such questions to rest. Equivocating over communism necessarily requiring literal ownership misses the point. Literal ownership means little in the face of actual control and power.

Everything you call free market failures are just your ignorance of the damage caused by the Federal Reserve and corrupt Progressive policies for the better part of the past century. "Liberal-Progressivism" is fundamentally against all 5 suggestions you posted.

I'm not suggesting we necessarily know 100% that Obama subscribes to the ideology of communism. But nobody here has offered any evidence to refute the suggestion. Pointing out that we don't have mind probes to read his thoughts isn't exactly the same thing as refuting _any_ of the evidence and self-admissions that he has statist/socialist/communist/fascist ideology. And anyone with common sense comes pretty close to 100%.

[cluck] people. Knowing the average lazy, ignorant moron is not a requirement for a good executive.

(Not to suggest I think he'd make a good executive.)

If we determine there's a need to intentionally induce cooling to alter a warming trend, man-caused or otherwise, I'm pretty sure aluminum foil and algae farms will be a lot more successful than asking poor people to not develop and asking rich people to become poor.

Ask the Chinese what they think of man-caused global warming, and they'll offer to sell you solar and wind power made with no regard for the environment (taking you for a sucker) while they build dozens of coal power plants every week.

The fact that Republicans don't like remarks is a great thing.

Okay I had my fun. If the mods don't remove this spam, they can ban me for making fun of it. It's way too embarrassing being around this garbage.

"Reducing us into a three sided dice."

I disagree. I believe it's more hexagonal because of the noid coefficient of the matrix shards.

"Like a ciggerate, first one smokes half, second gets it halfway, and the third gets it at the very ending but still calls it an equal half."

If cigarettes can call themselves equal halves at the very end, I don't see why we should judge. It's their right.

"It no worries for the goose because he is trained to move forward nevertheless."

Not necessarily. And, even if so, he might define "forward" differently than you, who might define it differently than me. Unless we're going to specify which direction forward is, how much are we really saying?

hahahhahahhahahah @ Al Gore reference, as if anyone here is ignorant and gullible enough not to realize his film was a dishonest piece of garbage to the scientific community.

You're not a scientist. You know nothing of science or the wealth of studies done in the field. But don't let that stop you from talking like a scientist who knows anything of actual science (as opposed to repeating what you've been told like anyone cares): It's hilarious. Please give us more.

I was referring to Zarf BeebleBrix. [13]

Yeah, we know. The earth is about to freeze. Or heat up.