> of wrote:

> > Listos wrote:

> > of wrote:

> rice & listos you played in valenka/lethal fam in andro togather till listos was invited to leave fam after eor without a shuffle.

that's right!!!

bah, me and my memory. And if I recall correctly, I was twice as active as the rest of that group. Noobs.

i hope you took what those noobs had to teach and became a batter player...

they taught me jack shit. I learned more from Kagar and Daniel than I did from glue and them.

> of wrote:

> rice & listos you played in valenka/lethal fam in andro togather till listos was invited to leave fam after eor without a shuffle.

that's right!!!

bah, me and my memory. And if I recall correctly, I was twice as active as the rest of that group. Noobs.

...I dont like rice though

I used to make my own wine...does that count?

RICE! I knew it!

snailsex, send me a message. I'm in 1745

ehm, I'm the leader

Icy, 1745, I'm the leader

send me a pm or something and we'll see whats up. I'm looking for an attacker mostly. Active semi-doesn't matter, so long as you can send fleets, capture planets and etc

Snailsex, join meh! I'm looking for attackers! 1745

InSaNeJeDi 1745

pm me with xp etc

four score and seven years...bitch

> Rain wrote:

> PLEASE DO NOT POST ABOUT HOW FAM BANK IS BETTER... THIS IS ABOUT TEAM BASED STRAT.

Ok...

I say in a fam of 15 you have something like this:

Team 1
2 banker/pop, 1 resourcer/opper/retaker, 1 food/attacker.
Team 2
1 banker/cf, 2 resourcer/opper, 1 food/attacker.
Team 3
1 banker/pop, 1 resourcer/opper/retaker, 1 food/attacker.
Team 4
2 Bankers/cf, 2 attackers/res(1 iron 1 endu)(Both make food),

This is obviously only for ideal circumstances. I want to hone in a strat and eventually try it out. Anyone want to give me some advice. I don't like Fambank... It works only when the entire family is completely willing to follow and be constantly active.

Any suggestions?

as for an ideal fam of 15 i would say

Team 1
2 cf/to bankers/2 attackers

I believe this is a good choice because cf bankers usually are able to grow faster early on and support their attackers. Once they convert to cf/to's they'll be making mass amounts of money. The attackers will most likely be large attackers and thus be able to make rez. Etc.

Team 2
2 cf/to bankers/1 resourcer/1 attacker

Again, same idea with the bankers, only 1 attacker and 1 resourcer. The resourcer is able to produce the food and rez as is the attacker (more focus on rez) or even food on attacker and all rez on resourcer. Bankers should make enough to support them both, and then have extra for savings.

Team 3
2 cf bankers or pop, 1 resourcer, 1 small or medium attacker (if small attacker, push 1 banker to team 1)

this is where activity drops or the semi-active people are. Pop are much slower at the start and boom about halfway to 3/4 expo phase. the pop banker should make enough to support both resourcer and attacker if the attacker is small. If the attacker is medium then the cf banker may be needed to pick up any slack at bor. Then, depending on expansion and what not, the cf banker can move to team 1 or where he is needed.

Team 4
1 pop banker, 1 small attacker and 1 resourcer

pop banker can support the small attacker and resourcer at first. Simple team work really. Resourcer and attacker send stuff to pop banker after building 50 mf's and 10 rs. then go from there

this is has advantages and disadvantages obviously so.