Sucks for you, Arby! 

Why don't I get a team? 

Wait... there was no "aha, brilliant argument coming up?"  Just informing?  Bah, that was boring! 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_God_we_trust

The motto was first challenged in Aronow v. United States in 1970, but the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled: "It is quite obvious that the national motto and the slogan on coinage and currency 'In God We Trust' has nothing whatsoever to do with the establishment of religion. Its use is of patriotic or ceremonial character and bears no true resemblance to a governmental sponsorship of a religious exercise."[27] The decision was cited in Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, a 2004 case on the Pledge of Allegiance. These acts of "ceremonial deism" are "protected from Establishment Clause scrutiny chiefly because they have lost through rote repetition any significant religious content."[28] In Zorach v. Clauson (1952), the Supreme Court also held that the nation's "institutions presuppose a Supreme Being" and that government recognition of God does not constitute the establishment of a state church as the Constitution's authors intended to prohibit.[29]

How much Middle Eastern production is done by US and European foreign workers?  Remember, we're talking about an industry where nations have created entire cities so foreign workers could live without interfering with local cultural traditions.

Yes.
Beginning of 1st Amendment:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;

Additionally:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

> The Yell wrote:

> bogus

OPEC will just open the taps and drive the price down until US production diminishes

And the US would then be able to respond with equivalent import tariffs, as per WTO regulations.  Even if the US outproduces Saudi Arabia, the vast majority of its production would be for domestic consumption, so that works.  Meanwhile, the Middle Eastern nations that depend on oil for... oh, 90% of their budgets... would be sort of screwed.

I'd reply to that, but I'm too busy staring at pictures of trains. 

I'm pretty sure it's fair to say that since the theme change means we won't have to listen to Flint's rapping anymore, everyone won that round.

Mafia would be like "Okay, let's kill the special roles at night," then declare their names as various townie names, while at the same time focusing their killings on the townies whose names aren't disputed and the special roles.

If California elects him governor, I vote to kick that state out of the Union!

I just want to add to the argument against Justinian that enforcing his proposal would actually require the IRS to perform physical examinations of individuals as part of their audits.  "Okay, now that we're done examining your books, we need to check your blood pressure."