Nox won size > winning NW?

Super MON. Ironic?


Rogue, awesome PvC, although you missed Star out in our line up tongue
Also, " Also, you have mizzle and bullet to pick up any sloppy seconds."
I'm not entirely sure I understand this, and I definitely don't like the sound of it. I'm banking anyway, so my raiding will be limited

> Geese wrote:

> Members in family #3910, Key to Success(46,13) as of Week 1, 0

    Empire    Race    Networth    Planets
      Capability     Slave4U     1100gc    1    [ONLINE]
      Inactivity     Owns!     1100gc    1    [ONLINE]
      Respect     ..||..     1100gc    1    [ONLINE]
      Vigilance     Aztekkies     1100gc    1    [ONLINE]
Vice Leader     Obedience     Camaar     1100gc    1    
      Agility     Country Boyz VII     1100gc    1    [ONLINE]
      Courage     -Def's SPECIAL vol3     1100gc    1    [ONLINE]
      Loyalty     whore?     1100gc    1    [ONLINE]
      Compatibility     Standardization     1100gc    1    [ONLINE]
      Reliability     Revalons     1100gc    1    [ONLINE]
      Bravery     Banking USA     1100gc    1    [ONLINE]




Great example being set by their vice leader there...
tongue

whats the (*age-12) bit all about? :s

Yeah, but three rounds in a row? How many more moons are there for him?

731

(276 replies, posted in Universal News)

23     All Time Low     Wardancers     51     163188
donno again



Me, I wasn't active enough to deserve to have survived tongue

*hood
*ghetto

Geese, find me tongue

> Render wrote:

> Who's hot and wet ?


You are?

Jimbo idn't, Jimbo was one of the only ones who retook on us

735

(168 replies, posted in Universal News)

"so it is a matter of time we retake everything we lost"

How long does it take to retake ~350 planets? Compared to how long is left of the round?


Also, when is round end? :s

736

(168 replies, posted in Universal News)

I've gotta agree with Jimbo, I don't think render's dishonourable either.

737

(168 replies, posted in Universal News)

Render, 58 don't have that many planets to give you tongue

738

(168 replies, posted in Universal News)

> General Mizzle wrote:

> Lol Render im not whining you the one who does. I'm just saying grow balls and fight back tongue

Sex comes afterwards to make things good between us again ok? tongue


Hate sex or make-up sex?

tongue

739

(168 replies, posted in Universal News)

Temp would love it if it happened to him. He did last round when Tryme tried it with us?

Everyone says about 53 not having done anything and whatnot, but there's only 3 of the original members here, the rest of us joined mid-round, and we're been busy since then!


Render, abusing the rule would be for us to expo into your core than give the planets to our larger ally to portal, surely? Or having a big fam member blow them up when you're in a big war with another top alliance, leaving holes in your core that would be harder for you to keep track of.
Either way, I hope our love can survive this setback smile

740

(168 replies, posted in Universal News)

Oh, I'd say you were lucky for sure, but I would still have asked my allies to remove us - you gotta pay attention to what's going on in the gal, and who is in which fam. If you'd been doing that, you'd have noticed that we're a fairly warlike fam, and so it would have been silly to take any chances. If nothing else, you can move some DS's to cover particularly vulnerable systems.

741

(168 replies, posted in Universal News)

> FSmallzz wrote:

> and lick my balls cock suckers. obviously they dont get the point that 58 was AHEAD of us in NW AND PLANETS. and then u have tr a mod. calling us vultures.. wTF? u noobs .. either stop sticking bullshit up ur asses so far, and see what really happend. stupid ass noobs. and TR U SHOULDVE KNOWN that u guys were ahead in nw AND PLANETS stupid mod




Sounds pissy to me tongue

742

(168 replies, posted in Universal News)

I wouldn't say it's abusing it, it's simply using it to our advantage. We could have just taken the planets in your core, portalled them and sat on them, but that would have been boring, we might as well have some fun for EOR. Anyway, your illustrious allies could have removed us if you'd been bothered about us. But they didn't. Regardless of the fact that they've been at war, if you'd wanted us removed you'd have had us removed. The fact that you didn't either means you weren't bothered about us being there, or you simply underestimated us.

And Render, you say about 52/49 farming 48 who have no ally - pretty sure their ally is/was 58, the fam that you are/were farming yourselves.

743

(168 replies, posted in Universal News)

I'm having fun smile

744

(168 replies, posted in Universal News)

Former last place vs former first place.

Ironic is nothing else. It's not something you see very often in PW tongue

745

(9 replies, posted in Universal News)

shotgun not me

746

(343 replies, posted in Universal News)

That answers it then, only the Dutch would be that silly tongue

(I hope to god I remembered right, else I'm gonna look a right idiot about now)

747

(343 replies, posted in Universal News)

@Skyline: If 51 were 10x smaller, surely you wouldn't have been able to attack them?

748

(343 replies, posted in Universal News)

Serenity, no matter what you say about t&c's, that was always going to be a controversial move. Surely you must be able to acknowledge that, even if you don't believe that it was yourself.

749

(343 replies, posted in Universal News)

Render, stop bitching about them pulling that move on us, they still could have killed my fam atleast if they hadn't done it. Only surprise was that was lost so little despite that move tongue

750

(343 replies, posted in Universal News)

I read some of it. All I saw was IA accusations, talks of NAPs, and Destroy Cash reports.
I guess I need to read from earlier than page four, as a lot of it was out of context.