701

(76 replies, posted in Universal News)

> Gondor wrote:

> zero op support. There was a small degree of planning tongue

How can it be a fail? No one got trounced within the first 3 ticks. If you consider getting destroyed early like that a non-fail then Lee is an expert... (sorry Lee... tongue)


Its a fail because your fam clearly either:

A. Did know how to win a cancellation war

B. Half assed it =p

C. Is inactive


big_smile

702

(76 replies, posted in Universal News)

btw, this war fails.

I don't understand why no one knows how to fight wars anymore lol

703

(76 replies, posted in Universal News)

its just horrible luck X(

86 just did a horrible job planning the war. Its ok though, at least they tried. Not sure how they managed to do that with so much savings though =/


Edit: Not taking a shot at 86 btw, just saying =p

But as long as people had fun then that's what counts.

All I have to say is....

If guys are gonna cancel nap and trash talk, at least know how to fight a cancellation war =p

Anyways, good try, glad nobody broke nap or tried to farm their way to catch up. It may not have been a round filled with much skill, but at least it was somewhat honorable and competitive.

706

(66 replies, posted in Community)

Nolio - Black Primo

Stfu white boy X(

707

(76 replies, posted in Universal News)

I agree =p

708

(311 replies, posted in Universal News)

> Caprica wrote:

> it's buttcolon and monkeywench


noobcannon and monkeywitch!

709

(311 replies, posted in Universal News)

lol I told you repeatedly to close down MW. This is a disgrace =p

When an eor features Luster, Arganon and Artic as key attackers something is horribly wrong.

710

(311 replies, posted in Universal News)

> Artic wrote:

> u wish arganon, ur fam isnt going to hold any of the planets


we will stunt your infra for long enough to make us happy



Round is over. Nobody cares about infra anymore lol

711

(311 replies, posted in Universal News)

> Tobes wrote:

> you keep going on about this ally aid business

it is perfectly legit and not in anyway a break of any NAP or agreement.

ally aid is fine and smart play on there side.




Yeah its perfectly fine. Its just funny because they cancelled the nap and had nothing to fight with lol

Usually you need ally aid when you are the one who was cancelled on =p

712

(311 replies, posted in Universal News)

91 cancelled. I don't understand why they didn't cancel when they had more savings lol

To me, everyone was stupid.

91 was stupid for not bothering to properly prepare for a war they started.

90 was stupid for leaving themselves vulnerable to another fam.

97 was stupid for being shitty at planning a war.

99 was stupid for not jumping first tick and still getting hit by Lee due to a mistake =p


All in all, a lame round with a lame finish.

713

(311 replies, posted in Universal News)

Its not 1v1 with ally aid lol

Not that there's anything wrong with ally aid. Just means that you can't claim its a 1v1 =p

714

(311 replies, posted in Universal News)

lol'd

715

(170 replies, posted in Universal News)

I'm not gonna put anybody down. There were things that I would've done differently from my IC experiences on both sides but all in all, each side gave it their best and at least tried to win the round in as great a fashion as they could. They could've just pnapped for the round and farmed. Good job guys.

716

(311 replies, posted in Universal News)

Not as long you have fleet they aren't =p

717

(311 replies, posted in Universal News)

lol Yeah josh he is an uber noob. But still....somehow better than Arganon =p

718

(311 replies, posted in Universal News)

lol I don't understand why its so hard to see that Torment is brand new to this game? =p

Personally I'm amazed that he mustered up the ability to sabotage an attacker portal

719

(311 replies, posted in Universal News)

lol yeah I take that back =p

I have some great quotes to share when the round is over btw big_smile

720

(311 replies, posted in Universal News)

I don't know. The more Lee talks, the more not smart he sounds. He sounds just as bad as Arganon.

721

(311 replies, posted in Universal News)

lol When people can sit down, plan a war, go through with the war and just have fun, I'll be interested. The extra bs that comes around lately is not interesting. I'm not gonna spend the next two weeks debating nap breaks and hidden agendas. Better things to do in life than that.

722

(311 replies, posted in Universal News)

@ Lee


I gave him a list of planets of mine to send to earlier in the round. He thought hey were nuke coords and nuked me =/


Anyways you guys are all lame and whiners. This round doesn't interest me anymore.

723

(170 replies, posted in Universal News)

> Render wrote:

> > Metrex wrote:

> hahaha no because the winner deserves the win... if we killed you early render you wouldnt be talking so

we think its fair the winner when decided should get a looot of payment smile


if you killed my fam before now you wouldnt be fighting this eor war and 75 will be winning the round for sure

I aint saying it is unfair the winner of your war wins the round, but giving 500 planets for free to your enemy is unfair, it is also un-natural for the game itself, we (as a whole, I'm not included) cheat swapping planets with ally to win size, now you want to cheat swapping planets with enemy to win size, that's really LAME, just fight and farm the loser to win size, cause therefore I dont think you have morale enough to take 500 planets in a row



That's actually how old wars were fought since early IC. Winner had to pay up hundreds of planets. That's what made the war worth it. And its much better than farming. At least you can say they were earned.

724

(98 replies, posted in Universal News)

lol indeed

725

(170 replies, posted in Universal News)

Epic =/