651

(70 replies, posted in Universal News)

1. Teddy
2. Nolio
3. Flint

edit: not allowed to nominate myself sad

652

(31 replies, posted in General)

"Counted to the ten billionth number of Pie"

thats a lot of pie yikes

653

(23 replies, posted in Ideas)

they have better things to do

654

(23 replies, posted in Ideas)

problem is that thumb up or down would be given to the poster rather than the post all time time.

655

(48 replies, posted in Ideas)

how about giving every family a core of x systems around their hs which no other family can enter.

it will give small families a bit of base area, and possibly you can outlaw demanding other cores.

656

(19 replies, posted in Questions)

im guesing soon
if there are no problems, it should be back open within 24 hours

657

(135 replies, posted in Universal News)

Magni, we're not giving up, this is not about this specific case

its about the general idea of honour in ic.

I asked the mods to arrange a general IC chat discussion on honour. And perhaps creating written guidelines on honour and general behaviour.


If that's not happening i'll be looking to create some sort of mw police family that doesnt play for contention.

People in this game seem to forget that punishing a dishonourable family with multiple fams at the same time is not IA if you dont cooperate.

658

(74 replies, posted in Universal News)

you're all breaking rules. X(

659

(135 replies, posted in Universal News)

no, hellzy
you saw it, 2 rounds back, when you were my little banking bitch
we owned everyone badly, and we played with honour.

660

(135 replies, posted in Universal News)

sheesh, this is not at all what i wanted to achieve with this thread.

this is not a whine, this is not a personal attack on lee (i usually get on well with him)

what i wanted to achieve with this is a discussion on honour and "the way we do things in IC"

Im hoping to achieve a code of honour in the near future, and calling to the mods to open this discussion.
I'm hoping to get rid of this "rape or be raped" attitude that is going on in IC over the last years

661

(135 replies, posted in Universal News)

If you dont want to take planets anymore, THEN DONT
noone is forcing you to.

i dont see why we should pay for that.

662

(135 replies, posted in Universal News)

It isn't.
I have never ever ever demanded planets for a nap. Ever.
And I can't remember BoR raids in my early days either. You fought, you won or lost, you went on with the round.

663

(135 replies, posted in Universal News)

its not the raid im complaining about.
take planets or dont take planets, but dont do this...

664

(135 replies, posted in Universal News)

Also, this is not a Lee bash. I don't know, I have played with Lee in the past, and if i recall correctly he's a somewhat good guy and we got along well.
I'm sure this is a do it, or get it done to you kinda deal. But still, sheesh...

We really need a code of honour and some leaders that are willing to maybe risk a round to enforce it.

665

(135 replies, posted in Universal News)

First of all, let me state i care fornication all about my planets, i am playing semi-actively in a family in pw i randommed into and liked.

But now this happens.
Lee's family (or whoever is leading it) raids my fam for a bunch of planets, not a tactic i'd use at SOR, but fair play, it happens. Then Lee comes to our chatroom saying that if we don't pay up 50 planets (out of the 300 we have) for a pnap, we're going to get wave 2 of the raid within 3 ticks.

Surely this is not what IC is these days?
If it is, no wonder we're not getting any new players... Don't you people realize that behaviour like this is killing the game?

Why not play decently. Hell, I wouldn't even have cared that much if you had taken the 50 planets, or even a 100, and then offered a nap for free. But "give 50 planets or you're dead" is just frickin low...

666

(74 replies, posted in Universal News)

that's right!

667

(74 replies, posted in Universal News)

i think i may have intimidated people sad

668

(41 replies, posted in General)

are you cheating on TU?

669

(38 replies, posted in Politics)

wait, why is the imlied probability 104.5% when added up.
is there a 4.5% chance they'll both win?

670

(2,141 replies, posted in General)

Ok, a tip X(

this has to do with the netherlands and luxembourg, but is in neither.

671

(41 replies, posted in General)

i thought we decided on TU...

672

(14 replies, posted in History)

if i recall, it was maniac that faked his own death for a week, then came back to laugh at everyone

673

(2,141 replies, posted in General)

lies!

674

(11 replies, posted in History)

+1

675

(2,141 replies, posted in General)

http://i.imgur.com/6ziWX.jpg