Before the 95 cancellation we were abit worried they would cancel, as they had major savings. That forced us to save and cancel on them instead. Just like with 01 earlier, we were on top of the sitiation. 01 and 97 was both caught with their hand in the coockiejar trying to cut corners, and had no choice but either fight an uphill war, or pay up.

Arby im sorry for assuming u arent a retard, clearly  i need to speak tarzan language here

UGH FAMILIES WANT TO PAY PLANETS NOT FIGHT HUMILIATED UGH YOU JANE

get the picture?

My overall impression is that if wars were less destructive and savings less vital, people could keep warring without being crushed by the "builders"

Im not sad for my fam this round, we win thats np, but im a little sad about the game, because these big wars cancellation style used to be the most fun that was in IC, and it used to be a chance for smallers fams to get a break, cause the big fams were finally duking it out, jumping market prices and exploding planets etc. Now we see families like 95 and 97 paying 400+ planets (an insane amount) just to get out of a real war, so they can get back to farming smaller fams faster.

They paid us 450 planets

I agree somehwat with you POley, waring costs too much economic damage, not only in attacks and ops, but in foregone growth

And i really cannot phantom why the #2 fam in the galaxy should be paying the #3 fam to avoid a war so bad.

How come you have top families in MW, 95 and 97 per example, 01 made the offer but was declined. To pay 400ish planets to avoid a war? Where is the desire to fight?

So 95 didnt take any planets from 89 last 2 days?

So you make (valid) arguments about why the ranking is complex and inacturate, why bother? WHO admitted it themselves. And you leap from that to conclude that US has the worlds best healthcare? Where is your basis?

Norway

theres ur example kemp we oh so socialist state...