were looking for 2 hc attackers to come with too! if anyones in an inactive fam and wants a bit of fun over mw that is! . x

death... its likely neither one of our fams would have 'owned' the other, but we had first strike, that gave us an upper hand, nontheless it would have been a fair fight.. you even said you could own us there.. well it would have been a good chance to prove it if youd fought 1 v 1.. if we had have been beaten id have laughed and said well done! .. instead now im sorta half pissed half not bothered merely because it had to be 2 v 1 under these circumstances..

but oh well.. no hard feelings.. your alliance did what it had to do to survive.. its the way of the game... me and frenzy off to mw now instead anyways... good luck to allll for the rest of the round xx

Yawn...

2 v 1 isnt fun

ah well... just wait till next round you bunch of gays humi gonna pwn hehee..

tbh 2 v 1 is part of the game allies helping eachother out..

the only problem i have with most of this is the fact 71 never let us and 74 fiight when 74 and our fam were even nw.. fair enough if wed starting owning 74 to the ground help then but you made attacks before 74 had even thought about it.. thats what gets me... when allies are fighting your battles for you before youve even tried..

Furthermore, although they were indeed allies.. the main reason was highlighted earlier, 71 jumped in so quick for 74 because the leaders are brothers.. i do believe 71 leader said "i had to help out my little brother" in family 74.. its a pain in the ass that this happened.. and outside ties should nout become a main faculty within the game...

Anyways, talking of diplo.. must go speak to 74 and 71,, seems a nap might just be in order. x

to the very end my frienddd xx

precisely my friend x

*brings cookies*

whos hungry? xxx

lol this place is turning into capri

whine whine whine