426

(11 replies, posted in Universal News)

it's karma. the universe is punishing them for OHing me X(

427

(159 replies, posted in Universal News)

rin pls go

428

(159 replies, posted in Universal News)

he's just a troll. don't feed the trolls

429

(10 replies, posted in Politics)

Deci quit trolling flint. Next time will be a forumban X(

430

(83 replies, posted in Universal News)

someone plays eve

431

(60 replies, posted in General)

SC2/Diablo 3/CnC5

432

(59 replies, posted in Community)

wow hi kb yikes

433

(378 replies, posted in Universal News)

oh the irony

no one a couple players from 26 are pmoded

435

(44 replies, posted in General)

http://i.imgur.com/bSUD8.jpg

minimalist desktop - i prefer launchy to desktop icons smile

wallpapers shuffle every couple hours, this is the current one though

update: rizzy is in pw

437

(10 replies, posted in Community)

Spam.. however I am intrigued, and will leave it open

438

(97 replies, posted in Universal News)

heh -_-

439

(97 replies, posted in Universal News)

AD is a work in progress tongue

next round will be a smaller number of large fams so there's a better chance of having someone active in them

Sean Connery wrote:

i love how he was blocked for having multiple accounts yet calling someone a 'faggot' out of the blue is totally reasonable --- good mod team we got wink

I'm not sure what to make of this? are you implying that having multiple accounts should be legal and calling someone a faggot should be bannable?

http://i.imgur.com/wwnAu.png

edit: fixed mistake on sheet

this is why we can't have nice things..

ETA till rain nap break: 72h

444

(6 replies, posted in Strategy)

I don't like your rule tongue 

though the concept is interesting, with 26 days left in the round (assuming average market prices) i would go to at least 700% and probably higher if i was playing SS (which i assume you are)

445

(8 replies, posted in Strategy)

i think what he's saying is that even though you lose a greater amount of RP's on 80 sci, the jump from 79->80 is very large (exponentially larger than the jump from 39->40) so when you kill science on someone with less rcp you're more likely to drop their overall research % down more than if you were opping someone with 80%

i'm not sure if this is actually true or not, i haven't dont any math tongue

well i'm not a statistics major so it's possible i used the wrong terminology tongue

my contribution to pvc thread:

http://i.imgur.com/GvmMw.png

will probably do these pretty regularly throughout the round

448

(63 replies, posted in General)

shut it zoz! X(

damn you hot list X(

you still dont know who i am miqdad X(