4,251

(74 replies, posted in General)

I'm not a fan of Tupac and welfare carols. They're unhealthy.

Those lyrics do portray something uncivilized. They're a most base form of ignorance and misdirection. They're theraputic and unhealthy, only seeking to misplace blame for people's problems; they only contribute to the problem(s) they pretend to address. They're aimed at keeping stupid animals stupid animals. That's about the definition of uncivilized.

4,252

(27 replies, posted in Politics)

I love how a fat slob who's arrogant and deceptive is trying to point out Amerikan problems. I tend to think more along the lines that dishonest arrogant fat slobs are our problem.

I'll be interested to see if it was done well. From the previews all I know is that the accidental shooting of what's-his-name and his subsequent falling looks like a really stupid joke. That doesn't even make any sense. We'll see!

4,253

(287 replies, posted in Politics)

Nobody takes creationism seriously. Debate concluded.

4,254

(94 replies, posted in Politics)

"but that makes niether a BAD person"
>>BULL.SHIT.

V N P is TheYell? I'm glad to see he's still around. tongue

You socialists get on my nerves. You have to lie and make shit up because reality is against you. Look at Amerikan history. All of your policies create/worsen what they are claimed to combat. It's so hard to tell if you are ignorant and misguided or overtly evil because all of your policy preferences result in the same backward results. The only thing keeping your "visions" alive is the two party system (which allows you to blame all of your success [ie, damage done] on the other party) and the general ignorance and apathy of the Amerikan public. Good job. Keep at it. With luck (and unprecedented arrogance and ignorance) you can topple the most prosperous nation the world has ever created and our kids can live in shit hovels together, talking about how great it is that they felled the evil empire and now live in equality (read: shit hovels) with the rest of the world.

And don't forget FGC, female genital cutting. Because you're on the side (and I hate sides; as I said, I do firmly believe both presidential platforms are comprised of arrogant, ignorant assholes) of the presidential debate that supports respecting nations' rights to FGC. Because ethics are relative, and if they want to have 3 women hold down young women to cut off their clitoris, then that's their choice. Who are you to judge.

4,255

(94 replies, posted in Politics)

How? Isn't he against vouchers? He's supported by teachers' unions. He's going to give you more of the same. Got that? MORE. In some districts teachers are paid to sit in rooms and have no contact with students because, though they're too dangerous, for various psychological reasons, to have contact with students, their union has so much power they cannot be fired. Obama and his trillion dollar spending increase will openly admit they want to pay more for education (like everything else) (which is primarily locally funded, as it should be). You're right. He'll do "something for the education system;" namely, he'll give them even larger amounts of money to squander as we ignore the fact that our children are held to lower and lower standards as Obama and his socialist friends continue to cator to the masses (in speech, that is) in this theraputic culture. They're against anything and everything that will actually increase the quality of education K-12. And have no doubt, Amerika is falling behind the rest of the world K-12, while our higher education is still top notch. How long can we expect our colleges and universities to lead the world when, across the country, we're lowering our standards?

Whatever. I don't think they more than touched on education in the VP debates. Obama doesn't propose anything that will actually improve our education system.

4,256

(7 replies, posted in Politics)

1) big_smile I'M ALIVE!

2) [They're gonna censor it anyway, so let's just say it starts with a "F"] Berkeley!

The different "definitions" I, and I think others, mentioned are just specifying whose regulations, AKA who is making them and who has to follow them. There's a big different in the discussion of corporate regulations that company managers make for their own employees and, for example, government regulations that regulate your industry and keep people safe (or choke the life out of your business because of either misguided or just plain corrupt decisions [more are corrupt than ever widely publicized; they just do a lot of work to explain them as misguided if they can't sweep them under the rug and never explain them at all]).

I don't know how well-written many of my previous posts were, but I'll probaby include a lot more diplomacy than I used to (with, of course, the open and outright shit talk for those who are just disgustingly ignorant, undereducated, and yet arrogant and loud-mouthed talking about things they're cluuuuuuueless of). wink

4,257

(74 replies, posted in General)

by and large you may be mostly correct. but you'd do well to bear in mind that everything you stated you hate so much about hip-hop isn't true across the board. you just advocated death for a lot of artists who share your values and happen to be lesser-known (that is, unknown to YOU).

listen to Lyrics Born tracks like  "The Last Trumpet" and "Whispers" and tell me you don't think he has genuinely good values and a not-alltogether-ignorant-and-harmful worldview.

Sure most hip-hop artists are dogs. So are most people of most nations. Don't be ridiculously ignorant in condemning hip-hop for openly stating values (/lack of values) shared by huge portions of your own nation's populations. There are plenty of hip-hop arists who feel the same way you do about other artists. It doesn't do anyone any good to ignorantly state you hope they all die.

What do you mean Obama didn't have a clue? He was their 2nd largest recipient of campaign contributions. You bet your ass he knew and did everything he could to keep their CEOs happy! And you bet your ass they're happy now that they got out with dozens of millions each while they ran their companies into the ground.

4,259

(94 replies, posted in Politics)

Well worth the watch? You weren't watching the same smut on TV as me, or you're on crack.

This isn't a multiple choice examination with 1 correct answer. The bottom line is yes, you look better when you answer the question and don't dance around it. I thought it was downright embarassing the way Palin totally ignored questions and launched into word-for-word repetition of earlier answers. Sure not answering what you're not comfortable with can be a good strategy. But you can't forget that people will notice and take note that you weren't comfortable. For a national election, the firest question is WHY NOT!? If you want to run the country, you really ought to be prepared to do something as simple as answer questions stating and clarifying your own positions.

Black Wing mentioned that they wanted to look good without saying too much. That's one of the reasons I hate listening to polititions promise everything to everyone as they campaign. Even the debates are monological, as the candidates aren't intelligent enough nor good enough public speakers to actually engage their opponents in debate. At no point did either VP candidate even suggest their opponent move their discussion of any topic more abstract or more concrete (as in, be more specific about how they intended to keep broad promises or be more abstract in connecting how certain of their proposed actions fit in with their theoretical views of how things ought to be done).

As for judging honesty, knowledge, and competence, I think we would all do a lot better (and vote smarter) to consider that there's a lot of statements and facts to evaluate before deciding these things about a debate. Regardless of public speaking and delivery, there's a lot to the honesty and openness of the candidates that isn't immediately evident from their delivery. Often their delivery just tells you who's a better liar; who's more comfortable deliberately misleading you. Neither candidate spoke very openly or specificly regarding economic or energy policy (save Palin on energy), which leads to my concluding statement:

I don't like either presidential ticket. They're assholes.

4,260

(409 replies, posted in History)

Theodora were bein' a wanker!!

4,261

(7 replies, posted in Politics)

Doin' formal logic, ye know ye need t' be more specific t' have any conversation.  big_smile You're not even limitin' this t' government regulation, industry standards, or just company policy, I'll warrant ye.  tongue

Some regulations be good.  There's nothin' wrong with laws protectin' consumers from gettin' cancer from or poisoned by products they purchase.


Some regulations be bad, Ya lily livered swabbie, yo ho, ho Regulation required US banks t' give loans t' scallywags who couldn't pay them back, yo ho, ho (Wasn't th' only thin', but it lost more dubloons) Watch th' news t' see how that turns out!