hahahaha that was my guess too!
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by V. Kemp
hahahaha that was my guess too!
He's your nigga? He's mixed race. Lil light skinned for my area. I think I'll call him whitey from now on for trying too hard and denying his heritage. That's some shameful stuff, that.
He'll do nothing but set an example? That's his job as President? What's his example? Marry rich? Make friends with bombers if it is politically expedient? Go to a racist church that teaches you to be a victim if it is politically expedient? Deny that one of your parents is white and that's the one that raised you because an ignorant audience will ignore this if you're mixed race and own your blackness?
His mom is a major grammar mistake. OH SNAP!
Estimating does not increase its quality, it allows for more abusing the census to produce results closer to what one wants than reality. Additionally, more accurate statistics of citizens are not assisted by estimates which overstate the number of criminals living within our borders.
Let me sum up how this exchange between you and I will end, Firewing: You're a complete moron who is too busy making baseless assumptions about me personally to engage the content of the thread. I am not a racist. I believe that every man is endowed with inherent dignity regardless of color, gender, or creed. I believe that racism is one of the great self-evidently-evils in this world. You're not clever in your baseless and pointless accusations of racism. You are not clever in your baseless and pointless accusations that I have all kinds of thoughts about President Obama that I neither stated here nor even have. You are not clever in equating my statement that legislation should not treat illegal residents of this country as it treats citizens insofar as it gives them votes and power in elections in this country to me saying that they are "no humans." You are not clever in trying to mock me with "vote republican," seeing as I am not a Republican.
Until you grow up and learn to have a conversation like an adult, no one is going to take you seriously. Until then you're just stupid for being so arrogant and cocky as to think that nonsense like you posted here matters to anyone. Honestly, nobody cares what you think.
Real evil is thoughtlessness. No one's wearing a costume plotting to kill mankind. While there are and always have been and always will be greedy people willing to exploit others for their gain, it is the thoughtless people who give them power who are our greatest threat.
It's mostly locally controlled, so generalizations about "America's schools" tend to be grossly inaccurate. Some people realize the value of educating their children so they can get ahead in life. Other people don't want children learning basics like diagramming sentences, because they'd rather have lazy, idiot kids who feel good about themselves than educated human beings who know the value of hard work and knowledge. Sometimes the idiots win and education suffers greatly for all.
I'm a libertarian. If Theodora is a libertarian, you can call me Miles Davis.
In other words, because they broke our laws and entered our country illegally, we need to change our laws to allow us to give them legislative power without the delay of waiting for another census. You're justifying legislation based upon your desire to appease criminals who ignore our laws. That's really cute.
So it's alright to abuse the census, as long as you intend to legalize some portion of that population at some point in the future?
That doesn't make any sense. You're still proposing that no one should object to giving illegals legislative power. So what that some number of them will have the opportunity to become legal citizens at some point in the future (which we presume because of Democrat control of the executive and legislative branches, so there's little question that more or less what Obama wants passed on immigration will pass)? You have no way to measure what portion will become US citizens. You're accepting inaccurate numbers on the census because you want illegals to have legislative power. Is that even a legal reason to accept inaccurate numbers?
His motivations for wanting illegals to have legislative weight are entirely, of course, political. It'll be beneficial for him, so who cares that it makes citizenship in the USA less valuable?
Not everything is empirically testable. Deal with it. ![]()
I'm sure his content appears insane to you, seeing as you haven't posted any. We don't feel obligated to engage cocky 10 year olds in any sort of exchange.
It's not like you can have a political discussion someone who is most comfortable with an all powerful government that tells you what to do, what you can earn, and what you can and cannot say. They tell you what's right.
Giving states more congressional power because of their number of illegal immigrants is a "simple matter of today's politics"? Giving people in this country illegally a say in the vote is a "simple matter of today's politics"? That's awfully presumptuous.
There is no scientific debate here. Obama's turning it into politics, not Republicans.
Amen."they have no qualms robbing people of their money", they just don't SEE IT THAT WAY. To them, that makes all the difference. To them, reality is subjective. Whatever lens they choose to color things with is real. As long as they all say it is.
woah woah keep real information out of here. we're much happier in our bullshit fairytale land of nonsense and how we feel things should be.
The politicians and government institutions they support are ALL about reducing competition. That's the primary function of regulatory agencies, not policing or safety. I recognize that those functions of such institutions are good and necessary, but that does not change the fact that that is not their primary function today.
They don't care about the estate tax. They have a multitude of options to avoid it.
Many working citizens are educated enough to know that demosocialists only tax them more and give them less and so are fiscally conservative, [TI] Sitting Duck. Just because someone claims they're going to be the politician for you and let you keep more of your own money and make the rich carry more of the tax burden doesn't mean they actually do so. Read between the lines.
It should tell you something that, aside from those who openly state that they'll vote for whoever promises them the most welfare, most working (most of the lower middle class) people support political conservatives and it's only those with more to spare (more of the upper middle class) who feel self-righteous in supporting the green socialists. They don't have the economic concerns of the lower middle class who are sick of government bullshit like what you posted. Right wing values do not make life harder for the working class and easier for the rich. Taxing working people more to support welfare programs that give inferior service at inflated price is bad for working people. People who work for their money and know that their quality of life suffers when a ridiculous amount is taxed from them know this.
They have the money to have real tax attorneys and avoid the new taxes. They, with their political power purchased with their financial power, literally, define the loopholes. While the rich pay the majority of taxes in this country, there are still a significant number who pay less taxes than many average joes making <$50,000/yr.
Some of them, in bed with politicians and institutions which further their own financial goals, do well to keep those persons/institutions in power and grow that power. This buys them protection.
Some of them feel really self-righteous in supporting a more all-powerful government that is more able to take care of everyone. They have the millions/billions to spare not to feel the impact of minor tax changes.
Their communal society is inherently more just than the individualistic capitalism of the grey squirrel!
You mistake me for someone who cares.
I'd say that I'd love to hear how random text about Bush/Cheney has ANYTHING to do with Obama's change as discussed here, but obviously it doesn't and you're just talking out your ass. The wider picture? Give me a break. This is the kind of stupid nonsense that keeps non-retarded people from posting to this forum. It sends them away in packs when they encounter it. There used to be a significant number of reasonable posters over the age of like 15 on this forum. They didn't agree on much, but they didn't make many ridiculous pointless posts and then spend their time crying about how Bush's immoral actions abroad have ANYTHING to do with Obama fiddling with the census.
I started a thread on a certain topic. If someone is so stupid they think they're attacking my post by posting completely irrelevant bullshit, yeah, I may well insult them in my reply. It's off-topic and has nothing to do with the thread. It's not an attack on me (I had plenty of policy and moral problems with Bush & Co.) and I'm not upset or angry. I'm simply responding honestly to really thoughtless posts which you call "quite valid" thoughtlessly.
Stupid posts off-topic that an average 10 year old wouldn't post from someone older than that warrant dismissal. Any explanation of such a dismissal may be insulting to the poster if they'll cry at hearing how stupid their irrelevant information was to post. Boo Hoo.
There have been younger posters here. I've not treated them poorly. But when someone is not so young and repeatedly responds in defense of their complete nonsense posts and demonstrates even more lack of understanding of basic english and the very most basic of reason, I'm not going to explain at length my judgement of dozens+ of Bush's decisions/actions in a thread that isn't about that subject. Anyone who explains that I need to respond to questions of Bush's morality in a thread on Obama's Census move is an idiot. I don't know a nice way to say it. It's just a fact.
grey squirrel grey squirrel swoosh your bushy tail
grey squirrel grey squirrel swoosh your bushy tail
crinkle up your little nose, put a nut between your toes
grey squirrel grey squirrel swoosh your bushy tail
- - -
dead squirrel dead squirrel splattered on the road
dead squirrel dead squirrel splattered on the road
where is your little nose, there it is between your toes
dead squirrel dead squirrel splattered on the road
>>but I did suggest that you should not worry because worse has been done in the past <<
You're like 12 years old. Good riddance.
You fail to address the issue and explain this move, Firewing. The Census is necessary. No one's arguing it shouldn't happen.
Worst things have happened in the past, Econamatrix? So because genocide has happened, I shouldn't discuss Obama's census move in a thread about the census move? Good reasoning. Until he opens the White House's workings and obligates them published as the Commerce Department is required to do, I'll be waiting on that transparency he's talked about. Yes, you made the point that we shouldn't discuss anything President Obama does because people have done worse things. Unless he blows up the earth, I'm out of line to discuss his actions in a thread. Point made.
Alternative explanation: The Census Bureau is Obama's precccccioussssss.
Good luck finding decent statistics for Gay couples who stayed together until death did them part. ![]()
I'm a Jedi. Stop discriminating against me.
We could. We couldn't get an uneducated child to do it. But that's just an argument for educating children better. And better parenting. It doesn't change the facts as stated above.
Fundamentally it's based on their insecurity stemming from their relative incompetence as human beings. Above and beyond creating safety nets and being philanthropic to their fellow man, they want an ALL-powerful entity that can run any/all parts of life. What could be more secure than giving one centralized power unlimited power?
When someone says they're Jesus and they want complete surrender from people, these are the people who give them the unlimited power they seek. Who seeks unlimited power? It ain't Jesus.
As good a place as any to leave it? There's no thread here. I've asked continually for any alternative motivations Obama may have. So far 0 have been proposed.
Econamatrix is probably on drugs or mentally disabled, because nothing he's brought up has anything to do with this thread. I started a thread asking a pertinent question about a present action of a current president. It has nothing to do with the last president and his VP.
Imperial Forum → Posts by V. Kemp
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.