"I have been inspired by the idea of how to use capital letters to solve the problem with there being too many vowel sounds.  Also, now that the letter 'c' has been freed, it is useful as the letter 'th', just as how now that the letter 'q' has been freed, it is useful as the letter 'ch' and now that the letter 'x' has been freed, it is useful as the letter 'sh'."

Although it will type faster, it would go against the logic of abandoning using one letter to create a double sound and also keep more letters into the system. It also makes your text unreadable for people unfamiliar with your system unless
they are willing to do an effort. Abandoning k,c and x makes it easier instead and so would be easier accepted by the public.

I do like the idea of getting rid of the vowels though, you make a good point there. But using capitals is not always possible, so maybe we should think about a better system. I think on that tomorrow.

One possibility would be using 2 vowels for a long sound: moor instead of more but morbid stays morbid. You can then abandon many duals like in posible. Again, I'll think about it tomorrow.

In any case those things won't be as easy and effective as getting rid of CQX. Maybe if someone pushes a new alphabet he should focus on that or resistance would be to high anyway.

Even better, lol.

Maybe we should make levels. We can never win the case for all of these rules at once. Einstein has a point there.
Level 1:
C:
using k when a single* C sounds like one
using s when a  single* C sounds like one
X:
using ks when a single* x sounds like one
using Z when a  single* X sounds like one
Q:
using k when a q sounds like one (so kuestion for now)

L2
In level 2 we include the ch, sh, qu etc

L3
In level 3 we replace more complicated things.

Level 1 is easily explained and makes the biggest difference. Its almost 2 to 4 hours less in school each year from the age they start to learn how to read and write! That alone is a huge economic advantage. It also saves on editors and spelling programs and makes it easier for non-natives to learn English. The list of pro's is endless.

Almost. Here is a complete list.
using k for hard C sound like in complicated->komplikated
using s for ch, sh and other c sound like in civilization->sivilization or combined with k like in school-> skool
using sj for ch like in chips -> sjips
using Z instead of X
using ks instead of x like my ex-wife->eks-wife
using k instead of Q faqir->fakir quebec->kebek
using kw instead of qu question-> kwestion

We can use it the same way in dutsj btw. I will think about German, Frensj and Spanish tomorow.
and from now on we will be typing either an azerty or a werty keyboard.

14% agriculture
38% industry
47% services

in 2008 tourism was good for at least $11 billion directly. It could have been doubled by now in better circumstances. Indirectly it creates profit as well like eg in public relations. Over 12% works in tourism that makes more then 1 out of 10!

Next to that, it seems like you justify MB's behavior with wrongdoings from the military. President Morsi gave the military every opportunity to become violent by making undemocratic laws. It was all they need to commit violence.

If you have had a more democratic leader as head of the MB, who was more moderate, over 90% of the people would have been supporting him. The army wouldn't dare to do anything then.

Instead he frightened a large part of the population by making himself pharaoh. The huge protests against his behavior are not part of a military plot... many of them voted Morsi!

btw, the slaughter of Egypt's military is all over the news here.

"This is a great discussion, dedicated to Einstein:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dkGAC8xPXg"

The first related video is "27 alien species" lol. But on a more serious note, he isn't very cohesive. He states his opinion but gives few arguments to back it up:
"1. When the financial was more regulated, we had more prosperity".
"2. New deal worked".
"3. republicans worked against Obama and his stimulus was low, that is why he didn't succeed now".
"4. we have to spend to lower debt".

Those very weak arguments/points took him over 12 minutes. Should I watch the rest?

I deserted. I kept true to my word.

"If a population votes to permanently remove the right to vote, is it antidemocratic to ignore the result of that vote?"
They did vote MB but didn't intent to permanently remove the right to vote. Many people who voted for the MB didn't expect them to behave that way. Naive but true.

"This is a great discussion, dedicated to Einstein:"
because he is the only one Hayek? Poll -small as it may be- proves different.

I wanted to post it but in the end I forgot somehow, so Thx for posting.

I like the second version (round 2) even more as the first one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GTQnarzmTOc

lol

"*expresses disagreement with whatever Baratheon's post was*"
*LP claiming not all Baratheon said in his first post was flawed, or at least we have to confess we lack any evidence that sais so*