Kemp,

I believe you are a little confused by conflating the left-wing fringe with Liberals. It's true they are left-wingers, but Liberals represent a location on the left-wing. At the same time, you raise a good point that it's also pre-mature to conflate contemporary Republicans with Todd Akin's apparent beliefs. The argument could easily be made that the coverage of Akin is an example of nutpicking and opportunism by Liberal media. But given the Republican legislative record for the past several years, it seems like there is a trend where socially reactionary Republicans are getting elected.

327

(44 replies, posted in Politics)

Beo,

Liberals aren't advocating equality of outcomes. This sort of inequality only happens under tyrannical regimes that impose barriers to entry, eliminating equality of opportunity.

Flint,

[no insult]

Yell,

Scientific data is essential, however personal experience goes a long way in understanding women's bodies.

329

(18 replies, posted in Politics)

> The Yell wrote:

>

then how can you straighten me out if what I said wasn't "wrong"? tongue>

If it's a social rule that hasn't been given the importance of a law, then people might shun you at worst. If it's also a law, then, expect retaliation. Unless, of course, the mob takes the law in their own hands.

Flint,

1. It's conceivable that a vagina is not completely dry. Yet without sufficient lubrication, a woman will be hurt by it. And without any lubrication, it would be difficult to penetrate her.

2. It's true that some women lie about being raped to protect their reputations. But women will lubricate even when they are actually raped. Whereas men's sexual physiology is usually telling of his desire, that is not so in women. The reason is partly that without lubrication, forceful penetration can cause such physical trauma to the vagina that she becomes infertile. So, in part, that is why women evolved to lubricate in response to hints of sex in their environment.

3. Since a woman can only become pregnant during ovulation, of course it's unlikely that a woman will become pregnant from any one episode.

4. In response to your confused understanding of US prostitution, the industry regulates itself very well due to the efficient flow of information that creates a powerful disincentive for both providers and customers to commit fraud.

Yell,

1. No it happens a fair amount of the time.
2. There's a difference between lubrication that is sufficient, insufficient, and none.

Yell,

1. A woman does not have to be aroused to lubricate. They can lubricate merely as a response to penetration, a bodily defense mechanism from harm.

2. It is very difficult to deeply penetrate a woman if she hasn't lubricated, and I imagine it would hurt the man as well. I doubt he would be able to finish the act if she didn't lubricate.

3. There are alternatives to vaginal lubrication, such as saliva. Also, saliva is intended to neutralize the acidity of the mouth.

332

(18 replies, posted in Politics)

> The Yell wrote:

> "Secularists don't believe politicians are the highest moral authority. I'm not sure where you got that silly idea."

So who is the highest moral authority? Susan Powter? STOP THE INSANITY>

You'll probably get a variety of answers, but few of them would name contemporary politicians. My answer, of course, is there is no morality. What you call morality is actually a list of rules that owe their existence to a combination of our social nature, culture, and/or religion.

333

(44 replies, posted in Politics)

I don't like that test. Of course people are going to favor an egalitarian society when you include such conditions. That also highlights the problem with Rawls' theory. What rational people would choose to do under the scenario you give them is different from morality.

If I were asked the same question, of course I would choose the option that gave me the most wealth. But in real life, that is no compelling argument for redistributing wealth. Instead, I believe in a society with minimal restraints, meritocracy and equality of opportunity. While there's no doubt in my mind that America's upper 1/10 of a percent are rent-seekers, I'm not in favor of confiscating their assets either. What is done is done, and we need to move on. We can do that by improving transparency in government, limiting the influence of money in politics, and lifting the barriers to entry these plutocrats created to limit their competition. Tying their hands to decide elections and fair economic competition will cut them down to size.

I also find it amusing that the article mentions Sweden as a model. It seems the Swedes are desperate to export their government and legal models all the time, and frankly, all I see is misandrist radical feminists.

334

(18 replies, posted in Politics)

Hey Yell,

Secularists don't believe politicians are the highest moral authority. I'm not sure where you got that silly idea. Actually, we commonly believe that the government is a necessary evil, and you must be ever vigilant and responsive if you want to minimize that evil and keep government accountable. You do that in ways that include a free press, transparency, and protest.

It's no secret that some segments of the Republican party are anti-science.

Abortion is a necessary evil that does more good than harm. Reproductive rights drop the price of sex because the natural risks of sexual activity for women are mitigated. So women are more accessible and men are less violent.

LMAO. He's from Missouri, which explains everything.

338

(7 replies, posted in Politics)

Detroit is that way because the automobile industry outsourced. It had nothing to do with its welfare policies, but industry regulations and unions had something to do with it.

They probably won't stop a determined attacker. However, they will stop an opportunist from attacking an undefended planet without a portal.

340

(12 replies, posted in Politics)

Flint,

Machiavelli's actual and most researched opinions are in "The Discourses on Livy." He explicitly makes statements like republics are more likely to serve the benefit the people than are princes, and summed up with others it's clear he supported republics.

So no. You're confused about what Machiavelli believed.

341

(12 replies, posted in Politics)

I am confident that Machiavelli understood politics far better than you, Yell. And Machiavelli stated that Republics are corrupted by money.

342

(12 replies, posted in Politics)

Obama's statements were deliberately misrepresented. He meant that government created the environment for businesses to thrive. A basic example is the police that protect businesses from theft. Fact is, business doesn't thrive in anarchy.

343

(12 replies, posted in Politics)

Well, the Tea Party enjoys unlimited funds from the Koch brothers. Elites really don't care much for Occupy Wallstreet. Not that I blame them, considering how most of them are at best confused.

Yell,

Minneapolis is only 63% white.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minneapolis#Demographics

Although, Minnesotans are unusual voters. There is a old saying that is paraphrased like this: "Minnesotans live conservatively and vote liberally."

We don't have enough data to make any conclusions about voters for the democratic party and violent crime.  For example, Liberal cities could have higher crime rates because Liberals tend to promote generous welfare benefits and are more cosmopolitan, policies which would attract individuals with a propensity for violent crime.

346

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

My internet access has been irregular, and I nearly forgot. Good luck Xeno. I wish you well in life, whatever it is you choose to do.

347

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

[off topic]

348

(2 replies, posted in Politics)

Those making $250,000 are not rich, they are upper middle class. The highest marginal rate that should apply to them shouldn't be more than 20% by my estimation. But we should add more tax brackets with the top marginal rate being 55%, which would apply to incomes of ~$10million or more.

I also favor eliminating most deductions and eliminating corporate taxes, estate taxes, inheritance taxes, and capital gains etc.

We also need to drastically cut spending.

Also, it's outrageous that the professional, upper middle class pays the top marginal income tax rate.

349

(62 replies, posted in Politics)

I would do what was necessary to maintain my life, and I would sell nothing because souls don't exist.

Ryan as a VP is an inefficient allocation of human resources. He is most efficiently allocated in congress, where he can do a lot of good. Making him VP would place a great congressman in a non-position of the executive branch.

So I say terrible choice!