Yeah, I didn't particularly enjoy any.

Did it in the last thread and outlined a bunch of it here. The angry 15 year old crew has nothing to respond with. I NEVER get responses pointing out where we disagree with the basis of my positions. I NEVER get responses pointing out where in my reasoning we disagree which leads to disagreements upon the basis of my positions leading to my conclusions. You're not here to discuss anything. You're probably not capable. Maybe that's why you're so angry and it's always FAILSAUCE LOLOLOL from you instead of any substantive response?

A lot of the time I'm just giving my best shot at the real objections to your position and the most legitimate grounds for disagreement with you. The idea is that a discussion of the subjects will include a response to these real and legitimate points. A significant portion of the time my real political preference is not the thing I support. But it certainly doesn't look good to me if most of those who agree with my position can't explain how they discount the objections to our position. It's obviously not personal when I agree with someone's position but question them the best I can -- this is why ridiculous insult responses which do not clarify how one responds to my questions just look really, really ridiculous.

Europeans only enjoy racial humor at the expense of others.

Obviously. Nobody cares about an angry 15 year old retard.

I think every crying retard who voted for Obama is pretty funny.

LOL Sitting Duck. First thing I thought of.

Culture largely shapes how we see the world and interact with one another in it. The same behavior is interpretted very differently in different cultures. There are high and low context cultures. There are high and low power-distance cultures (hierarchical/egalitarian). There are individualistic and collectiveist cultures. There are cultures in which position is determined by ascription and others in which positions is determined by achievement. There are monochronic and polychronic cultures. There are different cultural filters which lead to differences in meaning in different cultures. Some cultures value something like blunt honesty more, others value saving face more.

Talk of "that's discriminating!" is cheap and ignorant. There are very real differences in values, meaning, and practice between cultures. We DON'T all act the same. We DON'T all communicate the same. We DON'T all interpret things the same. We DON'T work the same ways. To claim that we should all just ignore culture and embrace others is ignorant and silly. You cannot embrace your fellow man without understanding and respecting the differences in his cultures.

I am against the death penalty, but he still failed to make any distinction between the death penalty and murder. Sure you can equate the two to make your point that the death penalty is murder, but to say the death penalty is "no better" than murder without any explanation is hardly that argument.

Yes, clearly killing a murderer is no worse than their killing of an innocent person. You backed up that position so well!

breaks his instrument after every performance. [he plays the harmonica]

You should totally keep your pregnancy. Nordicia needs more numbers!

xeno:
>>Why do you make false claims of having pwned me, when the opposite is true?<<

Stop encouraging this retard. He couldn't be more delusional. We've already pointed out the most fundamental flaws in his "position," huge ignorance in his education, and retardation of his thoughts. He's just not reading anything you post. He's made that clear.

But don't hold it against him. He probably can't read very well. He's waiting until a robot makes him an OGLU and a lifetime supply of food and entertainemnt so he can be equal to the educated non special people.