be happy that 22 lost 400 mil gc on market then ![]()
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by Matrix
be happy that 22 lost 400 mil gc on market then ![]()
"Having space to construct new buildings on is vital for your empire's expansion. Therefore it makes me quite disturbed to see that your planets are running out on free space to build. Maybe you should consider getting new land by exploring a new planet or conquer one owned by another ruler."
give me planets X(
hi ![]()
and now come and rescue me X(
on the wrong site it seems ![]()
oh and Torqez i still have 1 tranny.. so be afraid..
maybe i should hit you so that you get something to do?
@Little Paul
"That is the problem when you take Wikipedia for a sole source. 46,5 million is by no way an accurate estimation of how many people are in fact able to vote. Can you tell me where the number comes from? (let me guess, Iranian official -and very unbiased- sources?)."
oficial numbers... even mousavi uses them...
and you say that less people are living in iran as expected? because 46,5 mil voters out of 70 mil doesn't sound unrealistic
that they already lied the last electione? btw they even had 1 mil more voters last time..
so those 46,5 mil might even be to low
and the electione bevor the last electione?
so you telling me they are making up the numbers of since years.... and your prove is?
please a link...
"Which is twice as fast as last time. But he was referring to some bureaus not to the time the last vote was counted obviously."
no he said 30 mil votes in 1 hour...
"Over 1000 Parties are denied the right to compete! That IS cheating. "
same over here...you know in every coutry you need to meet some criterias to be allowed to be on the voting list.
like having a amount of supporters etc. probatly in your country too..
your point probatly is that some candidates are not allowed to take part in the electione and canidates have to be approved by the ayatolla, not very democratic if you ask me, though thats not why the people are protesting.
and also that doesn't mean that the manipulated the votes.
"Then there are some things left in the dark they don't seem to have an opinion about:"
agree to most, disagree to some.. but that has nothing to do with the claimed "proven" manipulatione of votes during the electiones.
@Chris_Balsz
"How the hell could the BBC be running polls of Iran?"
they have an office over there?
but to admit they just qouted out of
http://www.terrorfreetomorrow.org/upimagestft/TFT%20Iran%20Survey%20Report%200609.pdf
"Still, it's an issue of bringing them out. That way, we can compare specifics."
for exampel
http://www.terrorfreetomorrow.org/upimagestft/TFT%20Iran%20Survey%20Report%200609.pdf
you have a list on polls on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_presidential_election,_2009#Opinion_polls
interesting is by reading our main media over here a lot of newspaper state that the electione was manipulated without giving any proof at all..
i still fail to see any signifant proof so far...
and in this thread?
just comments like:
"So you propose that they did in fact count 30 million ballots in an hour?"
and
"But having more then 100% outcome in total is ridiculous."
which are obviosly untrue...
they needed like 12 hours to count this votes.
and if 39,165,191 out of 46,5 milion voters vote that less as 100%...
@Little Paul
feel free to explain me why 39 mil is bigger as 46,5 mil...
"kay, on the "who was the favorite candidate" issue, I'm challenging both LP and Theo: Bring out your sources."
you can find both
offical newspaper always had achmadinijad leading... while the newspapers of one of the opposition canidates had the opposition leading in pools... yeah
though the bbc had achmadinijad leading 2 to 1 over Mousavi 3 weeks bevor the elections... and that was the only indepented source i could find..
"all volcanos togehter 200 mil tons
tons of what though.... i aint got the time to google the facts but most the crap that comes out of volcanoes is 10X 100X 1000X more powerful greenhouse gas
"
i asume you we were talking about Co2?
if not
"you can stop pumping out co2 tomorrow then a volcano can go up in 6 months time and pump out twice the amount"
twice the amount of what? hot air?
sulfur dioxide?
"you can stop pumping out co2 tomorrow then a volcano can go up in 6 months time and pump out twice the amount"
humans 27 bil tons
all volcanos togehter 200 mil tons
feel free to name me one volcano that did breake 1 bil ton co2...
cannot belive that idiots still use that stupid argument.
he shares with me i think
but i wont jump ![]()
fighterrun those who jump in your range ![]()
Noir statione your fleet too please ![]()
You have destroyed 1196621 Fighter at the target.
omg
lol
sry couldn't resist ![]()
no you have 24856020 Fighters at least ![]()
so he isn't that wozz in 69?
i'm confused.. 3 fams are warring 70? so he is in 70?
and 70 is fighting back at you?
or 69?
then Gekko taking one unportaled = farming?
probatly that also did count as fighterrun?
even our bankers farm fams now
impressive ![]()
@Tymo
next time statione your fighters
btw wozz is in 69
dunno what this thread about.. probatly that he took 13 planets of our banker in one system
and then lost 20 planet in the same a few ticks later... and because of that we are lame ![]()
maybe tymo shouldn't blow up so many unportaled planets with no defense on them
expecially when he has so less moral... lol
omg lol
the fam that constantly posting excuses why they lose is your fam, pp
would you have bet us in a 1 vs 1 war in the long run? probatly yes. but can you be 100% sure.. no.
it ussally depents which sites gets inactiv first and stops retaking.
you had the first strike on your site, and yeah that catched us ofguard. well executed
i just said it is not 2 vs 1 by 95 and us vs your fam.. my problem that your allies suck? don't think so
my problem that 72 hits your allies? don't think so
like it isn't your problem that 52 ops us.
did you ask your allies to stay out of the fight as you hit us to make it 1 vs 1? don't think so
so?
i having a fun time with your attackers.. no need to ruin that.
and about 52: they nuked one of our bankers (and we didn't take any of there planets the 5 years bevor that) while another fam farmed them.. maybe the just cannot read fam numbers correct ![]()
i asked why, they keep nuking, i took a few planets
yeah thats farming. like we farmed 51
and still they manage to op way more iron as your fam pp ^^
why keeps 81 trying to claim its 2 vs 1?
they and there allies hit us 2 vs 1... and then our allies joined which makes it 2 vs 2.
not to forget 52 who helps 81.
still amazing that 52 does a way better op job as 81 while having way less players and agents and wizards.
why is ignoring 81 the fact that there allies are the whole time op us and attacking us since this started?
and not just retakes.
i lost more portals to 75 as to 81 ![]()
evil ffs ![]()
Genesis is a gay noob X(
@Elrohir
he should post that strategy in the strategy forum
that totally will change ic ![]()
not really... if i hit one of your bankers i lose 1% moral... cannot lose less... see ![]()
i doubt we would get that easy 200+ planets from any fam... so thnx
next time be smart and think bevor you nuke a big fam because they took 15 new explored planets of you in there banker systems. ![]()
Imperial Forum → Posts by Matrix
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.