Giving more wealth to government to spend just ensures less productivity and a work force not at its optimum with a lower quality of living.
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by V. Kemp
Giving more wealth to government to spend just ensures less productivity and a work force not at its optimum with a lower quality of living.
I want to see arguments that the market isn't a compassionate person so it has failings; and then proposals that a government with the same lack of compassion and an additional lack of motivation (even motivation to waste [that is, misuse resources in order to fail, to whatever extent] in order to increase budgets next year) is the solution!
You know I hate sweeping ignorant generalizations, Otto... Okay, yeah, that's pretty much accurate. ![]()
Many make the argument that capital is more profitable invested in those nations, where leadership understands what conditions they must maintain to encourage growth. And they are growing at a much faster rate than the US. Obama is taking all the wrong notes from China. He's aiming for china a few decades ago, while China is making economic decisions aimed toward growth (something the US actually wanted decades ago).
Knows the Korean film "Tube" is [f?]in' awesome. And Agent T. is his hero [also has the coolest hero in the history of heroes].
I cannot respect a man who has to be so intellectually dishonest in goading people to support his will.
Anyone who respects such intellectual dishonesty is dishonoured.
Obviously we cannot wisely choose a course of action until we can answer one key question:
Do they taste good?
Only retards buy into this rhetoric that government spending creates wealth.
It's that simple. You either agree with the statement, are aware that you do not understand basic economics and cannot judge its truth value, or you're mentally challenged.
I love the new TV ads saying that there's no debate, "strong" environmental legislation creates jobs (a preemtive strike on reality preceeding the huge new "carbon" taxes coming). You couldn't offer a more ignorant and misleading ad for public consumption.
I vote to replace it with a MST3K 24/7/365.25 network.
Has never lost anything to a Jew.
Xeno said, "Wealth creation is not progress."
And then smoked a bowl of crack. Which he bought with welfare.
kissed a girl
in his dreams
They refused to show signs saying things like "we hate Republicans too."
He's going to "cut" the deficit... to something still way huger than anything before him.
Clicking the first link on the right labeled part 2/2 to follow part 1/2 was too hard for him. ![]()
says we've got nothing in common--no common ground to start from--and we're falling apart--says the world has come between us--our lives have come between us--still I know you just don't care--and I said what about Breakfast at Tiffany's?--she said I think I remember the film--and as I recall I think we both kinda liked it--and I said well, that's one thing we've got--I see you--the only one who knew me--but now your eyes see through me--I guess I was wrong--so what now--it's plain to see we're over--and I hate when things are over--and so much is left undone--and I said what about Breakfast at Tiffany's?--she said I think I remember the film--and as I recall I think we both kinda liked it--and I said well, that's one thing we've got--you'll say that we've got nothing in common, no common ground to start from--and we're falling apart--you'll say the world has come between us--our lives have come between us--still I know you just don't care--and I said what about Breakfast at Tiffany's?--she said I think I remember the film--and as I recall I think we both kinda liked it--and I said well, that's one thing we've got--and I said what about Breakfast at Tiffany's?--she said I think I remember the film--and as I recall I think we both kinda liked it--and I said well, that's one thing we've got--and I said what about Breakfast at Tiffany's?--she said I think I remember the film--and as I recall I think we both kinda liked it--and I said well, that's one thing we've got
I try not to lose too much sleep every time some millionaire leaves one of his 4 mansions, flies in on a private jet, takes an SUV limo, and tells me I need to stop using oil and creating so much trash.
Most people produce a lot more garbage than we can sustain indefinitely, but the only people claiming to care about the problem are complete nutcases/retards who refuse to accept the reality of oil reserves and the condition of the planet. They'd probably only do more damage to humanity than the evil owners of production who pollute the most now. Live responsibly and shrug and say "told you so" when in a few generations humanity has to change its habbits to avoid trashing the planet.
? You're obviously not familiar with the act and you approach it from a very strange perspective (your "mechanical" view is rather limited, ie oversimplified). Not one many healthy females share.
Good luck. You're going to need it. ![]()
Trying to be that analytical about sex just means you'll never be any good at it. ![]()
The most expensive things do not have brand labels like vegas signs. Ever. People who know what's what know that their shit is mad expensive because they know the expensive brands. Nike is NOT expensive and does NOT show status. I guess if you count like "I'm not AS poor as it gets, I'm 1 tier higher!" as status it does.
hahaha
For your information, in case it takes you a few years before you reach a basic sociology course:
The wealthy do not wear brand labels like signs. Eeeeeeeeever. Only poor idiots dumb enough to embrace the marketing that targets poor idiots do. The more you know. ![]()
Now if you are targetting poor idiots who are similarly indoctrinated to think that cheap brand names = status, then I suppose it might get you those whores. Watch out for herpes though. And the HIV. And a host of other infections such whores will share with you. If you ever succeed in your quest to get laid by trash. ![]()
Yeah avogadro. Washington elite will disarm the Amerikan public -- with the exception of their own armed guards. They need protection because they're important people. But I'm just a private man, so when I'm walking back from an event with my wife in NYC in a suit wearing 3 white gold rings, I owe muggers my rings (including wedding band) and wallet. I don't deserve to reach for my "wallet", a smith & wesson .45 from my shoulder holster, and remove these wastes of life from the living realm. I see it all so clearly now.
And any jewelry my wife is wearing too. We owe them that as well.
Seriously though, I think it's more humane that I be allowed to use a firearm. I've been mugged by a man with a knife before. When the police arrived he was about a forth conscious with a concussion and a gash on his head from where it met the pavement. If I could have just shot him in the leg I could have avoided a potentially fatal injury to the poor fellow.
Imperial Forum → Posts by V. Kemp
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.