Told by who, and why?

Likes Chuck-e Cheese

Has a power level of OVER 9

I like the Vatican Euros, though! 

Colonel Mustard.

If that's the case, then you still need to address You_Fool.

> V.Kemp wrote:

> Capitalism has the "goal" of producing a perfect society, You_Fool? I thought it had a purpose: To keep crazy people like you, who think capitalism and socialism have the same goal, who think that we need some blended socialist society to be successful, from interfering with my not-crazy life.

So there's no ideological justification for capitalism beyond "keep you out of my pocket?"  Sounds kind of small-minded...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zk69e1Vcmvg 

> Einstein wrote:

> There are more examples of such wrong doing. The Justices over the years declared a right to privacy existed, where the words privacy never existed. Oh do not get me wrong, privacy is a good thing in general, but we should have made a new Constitutional Amendment rather than act like pre-existing law said something it did not.

Some background:

1: The 9th Amendment specifically says that even though the Constitution outlines rights of the people, it does not mean those rights in the Constitution are the only protected rights.  Privacy fits under that rubric.

2: Other rights necessitate the protection of the right to privacy, or create implications that a right to privacy exists.  The search and seizure rights are a big one in this case.

Hmmm....

1: As of now, I would ask you what the purpose of your post is.
2: I think there's a somewhat simple way to distinguish between trolling and legitimate indictments of someone's discourse.  If people were required to post links as evidence, then readers would know for a fact that such was based on historical truth, rather than just anecdotal evidence.  I did this same thing as you, using links/quotes to prove such an argument, at which xeno made amends for the specific actions.

In addition, requirements of evidence links force the poster to consider what he is about to say before actually saying it... it forces the writer to put his credibility on the line...

This is a more complicated matter, dealing with an odd fine line.  It is probably best dealt with later, but that's just my take on the matter.

Possible players so far:
Me
V. Kemp
WFS
Bief
You_Fool

MAYBEs (including people who haven't said yes or no)
xeno syndicated
Chris_Balsz

Not exactly sure who would still play if we only had one family.  We definitely can't set up 2 competing Politics families.  However, joining up left and right into one big family would be an interesting way to get us known.