Let's ignore that taxation of private insurance purchases is porposed as a major means of funding. Because competition never did us any good any way. Healthcare costs are too high? Clearly adding more taxes to healthcare costs is the solution.

The point is that your judgement of what doctors ought to choose to work for (and where) has NO bearing on the REAL effects that such government control has on healthcare.

It's hoping to draw you into fallacious reasoning to even bring up what doctors SHOULD work for when what matters is real circumstances and effects in the real world. It's only even brought up to confuse you.

fed the bug with so many cookies it came BACK despite my scaring it away the last time

Kill 'em all.

Clearly they run the world because the youtube videos which I'm sure were professional and brilliant investigative journalism are no longer located at the indicated addresses.

Oh, wait: xeno blames them for the world's problems. In that case, they're clearly not our biggest problem.

>>but when companies can decide who they insure it is not available to everyone and so its not efficient for everyone.<<

What does that mean, that if I'm fat and smoke and engage in risky behavior and this effects my healthcare options the system is not as efficient? You have a strange definition of efficiency.

>>Under european systems I would be covered when I got out of school, no questions asked. <<

Yes, with waiting lists for primary care visits, specialist visits, and many procedures in many countries! If you are eligible.

And why the quotes? Are you not looking at the real efficiency but rather some imaginary use of the term?

The free market (try changing the channel if a children's program contains ED ads? just a thought. they're not making your kid watch. in fact there are even other things your kid can besides watch tv all day! in fact, studies show you're melting your kid's brain anyway with the idiot box, so maybe ED ads are the least of your child's concerns.) and local regulaitons (no gigantic gay porn billboards in public) own you, Morbo.

Aside from communication which poses an immediate threat to safety (ie yelling fire in a crowded theatre, because one must expect human beings to behave like retarded animals [because they, for the most part, are] and trample each other to death even when the perceived threat is only voiced to them and unseen because it's not real), I pretty much prefer to error on the side of free speech. Because I have the right to call anyone I feel like a wanker, and you wankers don't have the right to stop me. It's the TRUTH, despite the fact that YOU WANKERS CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH. Jack Nicholson said that.

If you wanted a pipe bomb with a nail coating for additional shrapnel, a copper pipe, black powder, and a fuse is a rather simple way to start (+tape and nails, if you so choose). A vice is useful for this simple construct.

is jealous of my avatar!

I like how you discount everything Rush Limbaugh says with a vague insult because he blows your idols out of the water.

She's said the same thing on 5 or 6 occasions. It's not complicated English. If she didn't mean what she said, she's intelligent enough that she would not have said it.

is the cause of the page break bug, in addition to many other ailments. (You want the bug fixed, but I will not be the one to fix it? Suck on this. )