251

(72 replies, posted in Universal News)

Race to 1400 ???

252

(38 replies, posted in Universal News)

Why not a HC round where everyone starts off with 25 portalled planets and enough stuff to build them to 300% OB and everyone starts off with same fleet size of about 10k Bombers, 100k figs, 500k droids and then kick back and let the true skill be shown since it now doesnt depend on if you know how to build or not.

I guess in reality it would be more of an attackers galaxy smile

253

(433 replies, posted in Universal News)

PvC ???

254

(72 replies, posted in Universal News)

shhhh timmy

255

(72 replies, posted in Universal News)

I demand a recount, looks like you are using leftest liberal good for nothing losers count process which is called cheating to win smile

256

(40 replies, posted in Universal News)

Well I guess genesis wanted to make sure our nap was technically a nap lmao

all of a sudden poof

We have signed a 72 week NON-AGGRESSION PACT with family 38 Stole Christmas (6938).
38 Stole Christmas (6938) has signed a 72 week NON-AGGRESSION PACT with us.

257

(40 replies, posted in Universal News)

No 38 has not done anything wrong YET, but if they break nap (and they are napped) then they will have done wrong.

258

(40 replies, posted in Universal News)

Facts are Facts 6933 I would advise you to not talk with 6938 you have a nap, no reason to talk anymore, talking was over the moment it was signed, the reason you dont sign ingame asap is to trade out planets.

If they attack then they are nap breakers and the rest of the galaxy has every right to gang up on them and teach them a lesson in how things should be done correctly.

259

(40 replies, posted in Universal News)

OK Genesis smile

260

(40 replies, posted in Universal News)

So yes or no only please so I can inform my fam.

Since 38 and 30 have only a signed nap NOT an ingame nap are you saying we DO or DO NOT have a nap?

Please just a yes we do or no we do not?

and if we do NOT have one then oh well time to make different plans then



Week 26, 3Reply Save
72H NAP between families 6938 and 6930

Standard Rules, no BS

50 system cores each

Signed, Timmyville: 6738
Signed, Boom Boom of Jack of Spades (#6938)

Signed, Middle: 6730
Sent to Boom Boom of Jack of Spades (#6938)

261

(40 replies, posted in Universal News)

Well, not to be smart ass or anything but once again I simply asked if a nap was signed by your leader and it appears that it was by what you are saying.

Does it matter if it was signed for 1 second or 5 minutes or in our case for several days before its actually a nap?

Does IC have some sort of rules that says a signed nap is only good if its been signed for a certain amount of seconds, minutes, hours, days?

OR

Only if the majority of the fam agrees with it?

Or is it a nap when the elected leader signs it?

And if it is a nap when they leader signs it then its a nap break if its not honored PERIOD no ands ifs or butts.

In my opinion the leader needs to mark you all rogue if you decide not to accept a legal binding signed nap or delete to make sure his word is his word.

I dont care how you make an excuse or want to word it but if 33 can post in here a SIGNED nap by the leader of 38 then its a freaking nap and nothing can be done about but BUT accept it or be a nap BREAKER in which case I personally will consider the nap with 38 subject to only being valid until we decide its in our best interest to BREAK it and I am sure you would not think we broke nap then Correct?

262

(40 replies, posted in Universal News)

Are you saying that the leader of 38 signed a nap (which makes it binding) and now other fam members are deciding to break the nap genesis?

Or is it simply a CF that was agreed until a nap could be signed later?

If its a nap signed then its a nap broken if not honored and thus I could not trust the nap with your fam that we have now since there is nothing that says it cant be broken later.

Also other fams would need to look at this also if they have a signed nap with your fam.

So a simple clarification on if you are actually going to BREAK a SIGNED nap is in order?

signed

IC Legendary Terrorist WS

263

(40 replies, posted in Universal News)

No a CF is not a nap haha but its still naughty

264

(40 replies, posted in Universal News)

plz post any fam that decides to break a nap on you because they will become immediate target even if we are napped with them.

Signed Legendary IC Terrorist & hater of nap breakers smile

265

(145 replies, posted in Universal News)

hmmm new leader haha

6941
Hii    Revalons    204051gc    62

Wonders who brought that idea to the table lmfao

Might get some where now.

signed

Legendary IC Terrorist WS

266

(145 replies, posted in Universal News)

Wow I now have another in a line of GREAT titles to be called thanks to the loser Cloud.

Not only am I known by these names...

IC Legend

All time Legendary IC Attacker

God of IC attacking

Now I am the Legendary IC Terrorist whoop whoop

thanks for a sexy title

267

(145 replies, posted in Universal News)

well 41 i advise to consider removing cloud as leader then marking him as rogue and then we can work to let your fam have some breathing room and enjoy the rest of the round.

I just want to crush and dispose of Cloud as I would any other piece of garbage I get rid of.

It's just a suggestion nothing more so dont feel like I am forcing you to do anything, I am just trying to think out loud.

268

(145 replies, posted in Universal News)

we have 1 nap only moron, and trust me punishing your loser fam is all we care about this round and we are loving every minute of it, thats why I want you losers to stick around and get an ass whoooooping for a long time to come.

and as for the n00b Stichio there is no one here saying its not OK for Cloud to do what 33 did to 38, just like its OK for us to punish them for being plain stupid.

AND PUNISH IS WHAT WE ARE DOING AND WILL CONTINUE AND EVENTUALLY YOU WILL NOT MAKE RETAKES LOL

269

(145 replies, posted in Universal News)

the last 23 ticks of this year

----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
72 planet(s) captured by Mu (100 %) (19 retakes).
38 planet(s) captured by Mo Mo (100 %).
24 planet(s) captured by Tau (100 %) (20 retakes).
15 planet(s) captured by Alpha (100 %) (4 retakes).
-------------------
149 from #6941
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 149 times. 1 families and 147 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 116 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 31.

----------------
-   BLOW-UPS   -
----------------


List of destroyed planets:


---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
---------------
37 planet(s) lost by Omega
23 planet(s) lost by Alpha
16 planet(s) lost by Mu
13 planet(s) lost by Tau
13 planet(s) lost by Mo Mo
4 planet(s) lost by Zeta
-------------------
106 to #6941
-------------------

lmfao losers

270

(145 replies, posted in Universal News)

This is so fun to be hammering 41 and they cant even knock us from the spot we been all along, while they dropped from 6th to 9th and will never recover smile

I have removed them from our core completely, our attackers are portalled in their core and hammering them so hell can anyone give me one good reason why we should settle for a nap that only gets us 75 planets when we can farm them to delete?

Not me, so WS is off to open a farmers markets to store all the goods from our farming skills tongue

NOW 41 PLEASE DO "NOT" DELETE BEFORE WE GET ALL THE PLANETS WE ARE HUNGRY FOR, PLEASE

271

(141 replies, posted in Universal News)

me too smile

272

(145 replies, posted in Universal News)

wiwi is in there smile

273

(145 replies, posted in Universal News)

wait they think they the only ones putting bankers in pmode so be real quiet shhhhh

274

(145 replies, posted in Universal News)

well, lets roll smile

275

(145 replies, posted in Universal News)

Its also safe to say we have stayed the whole time number 2 and you went from 6th to now 9th smile

2    It's All Greek to Me (6930) [85,85]    648    2083421    25608

9    The Empire Strikes Back (6941) [48,80]    536    1418409    18326