http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/561948_4022659019068_1179898723_n.jpg
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by The Yell
http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/561948_4022659019068_1179898723_n.jpg
wow it really got less whitebread than 2000
but back when it was 99% white it still voted for Mondale
Minneapolis runs right against that trend tho
although its' more of a stupid racist thing, their cops are stupid racists and they just assume blacks will commit crimes, so, whaddya gonna do
So Pain, did you flee the OC to commit your crimes in more liberal zones?? /squints suspiciously
well good
i used to be quite depressed
then I learned to blame other people for the drama
uhm, love you too East
Orange is low because there's no curbside parking anywhere in that town, you gotta find a garage or go commit crimes in Tustin, Santa Ana or Anaheim
not that I go there to commit crimes
I guess double parking is a crime but it's kind of obvious
i want augs and then I could see without glasses AND switch to infrared with a toggle, no scopes needed
I wish my mother had aborted me
This is no 'I wish I'd never been born' howl of angst. I love my mother, and having an abortion would have given her a better life
Email
Lynn Beisner
If there is one thing that anti-choice activists do that makes me see red, it is when they parade out their poster children: men, women and children who were "targeted for abortion". They tell us "these people would not be alive today if abortion had been legal or if their mothers had made a different choice".
In the last couple of months, I have read two of these abortion deliverance stories that have been particularly offensive. The first story is one propagated by Rebecca Kiessling, the poster child for the no exceptions in cases of rape or incest. On her website Kiessling says that every time we say abortion should be allowed, at least in the case of rape or incest, we are saying to her: "If I had my way, you'd be dead right now." She goes on to say, "I absolutely would have been aborted if it had been legal in Michigan when I was an unborn child, and I can tell you that it hurts [when people say that abortion should be legal]."
The second story was on the Good Men Project this week. In an article entitled Delivered from abortion: healing a forgotten memory, Gordon Dalbey tells a highly unlikely story about his mother's decision to abort him and her eventual change of heart. I say the story is highly unlikely because the type of abortion he says his mother was about to have was not available until 50 years later. However, Dalbey claims to have recovered a memory of being "delivered" from the abortion because as a fetus he cried out to God. He claims that the near-abortion experience had caused him psychological suffering throughout his life. Since recovering the memory, he has experienced survivor's guilt because he was saved when so many other fetuses have been aborted. In explaining how he overcame this guilt, he quotes a Jewish survivor of the Holocaust who says that the purpose of surviving is to testify to the experience.
What makes these stories so infuriating to me is that they are emotional blackmail. As readers or listeners, we are almost forced by these anti-choice versions of A Wonderful Life to say, "Oh, I am so glad you were born." And then by extension, we are soon forced into saying, "Yes, of course, every blastula of cells should be allowed to develop into a human being."
Stories like Dalbey's are probably effective because they follow the same model. First there is a woman facing the unplanned pregnancy that poses severe problems. In Dalbey's case, his family is suffering from extreme poverty, and in the case of Kiessling, her mother is dealing with the aftermath of rape. The story shifts so that the mother has a divine or moral enlightenment and knows that she must carry the baby to term. We are left with an adult praising the bravery of their mothers and testifying that their lives were saved for some higher purpose. But the story goes on to tell us how even the contemplation of abortion was horribly scarring for the person. The moral of these stories is clear: considering abortion is like considering genocide.
Here is why it is so effective: people freak out when you tell an opposing story. I make even my most ardent pro-choice friends and colleagues very uncomfortable when I explain why my mother should have aborted me. Somehow they confuse the well-considered and rational: "The best choice for both my mother and me would have been abortion" with the infamous expression of depression and angst: "I wish I had never been born." The two are really very different things, and we must draw that distinction clearly.
The narrative that anti-choice crusaders are telling is powerful, moving, and best of all it has a happy ending. It makes the woman who carries to term a hero, and for narrative purposes it hides her maternal failing. We cannot argue against heroic, redemptive, happy-ending fairytales using cold statistics. If we want to keep our reproductive rights, we must be willing to tell our stories, to be willing and able to say, "I love my life, but I wish my mother had aborted me."
An abortion would have absolutely been better for my mother. An abortion would have made it more likely that she would finish high school and get a college education. At college in the late 1960s, it seems likely she would have found feminism or psychology or something that would have helped her overcome her childhood trauma and pick better partners. She would have been better prepared when she had children. If nothing else, getting an abortion would have saved her from plunging into poverty. She likely would have stayed in the same socioeconomic strata as her parents and grandparents who were professors. I wish she had aborted me because I love her and want what is best for her.
Abortion would have been a better option for me. If you believe what reproductive scientists tell us, that I was nothing more than a conglomeration of cells, then there was nothing lost. I could have experienced no consciousness or pain. But even if you discount science and believe I had consciousness and could experience pain at six gestational weeks, I would chose the brief pain or fear of an abortion over the decades of suffering I endured.
An abortion would have been best for me because there is no way that my love-starved, trauma-addled mother could have ever put me up for adoption. It was either abortion or raising me herself, and she was in no position to raise a child. She had suffered a traumatic brain injury, witnessed and experienced severe domestic violence, and while she was in grade school she was raped by a stranger and her mother committed suicide. She was severely depressed and suicidal, had an extremely poor support system, was experiencing an unplanned pregnancy that resulted from coercive sex, and she was so young that her brain was still undeveloped.
With that constellation of factors, there was a very high statistical probability that my mother would be an abusive parent, that we would spend the rest of our lives in crushing poverty, and that we would both be highly vulnerable to predatory organisations and men. And that is exactly what happened. She abused me, beating me viciously and often. We lived in bone-crushing poverty, and our little family became a magnet for predatory men and organisations. My mother found minimal support in a small church, and became involved with the pastor who was undeniably schizophrenic, narcissistic and sadistic. The abuse I endured was compounded by deprivation. Before the age of 14, I had never been to a sleepover, been allowed to talk to a friend on the phone, eaten in a restaurant, watched a television show, listened to the radio, read a non-Christian book, or even worn a pair of jeans.
If this were an anti-choice story, this is the part where I would tell you how I overcame great odds and my life now has special meaning. I would ask you to affirm that, of course, you are happy I was born, and that the world would be a darker, poorer place without me.
It is true that in the past 12 years, I have been able to rise above the circumstances of my birth and build a life that I truly love. But no one should have to make such a Herculean struggle for simple normalcy. Even given the happiness and success I now enjoy, if I could go back in time and make the choice for my mother, it would be abortion.
The world would not be a darker or poorer place without me. Actually, in terms of contributions to the world, I am a net loss. Everything that I have done
I don't wish you good luck and goodbye, since I expect to see you around I will kick your ass uphill til you get to the mountaintop
no you don't want to meet him in game
you should all have only 1 team
Ryan's plan is bad because
1) it guarantees federal responsibility for everybody's standard of living
2) it lowballs the defined benefit you get.
If everybody admits the feds owe me a living, why should I settle for $20,000 a year in vouchers? Couldn't I live better with $25k? What's the moral basis to deny it to me? If I'm cool getting a $20k handout for breathing won't I vote for the guy promising $25k? Especially when he lies and says somebody else can pay higher taxes.
3) it assumes 3% economic growth and that ain't happening for some time, and
4) it still takes til 2040 to balance the budget. We won't be allowed that long. remember we're still on the hook to prop up Wall Street every time it takes itself out.
What a shithead, we have no unnecessary bases left. In fact we have too few bases, because if we tried to duplicate the military effort of WW2 we'd have to build new ones.
But notice the declaration up front is, we're not going to have to fight an industrial power. In fact we don't have to fight in Afghanistan either...when you decide up front that goatherders can bomb on New York and get away with it, sure, we can use a much smaller military.
I can't believe nobody has any comment on this
the technology to equip drones with micronukes is extant and therefore we made be said to be within months of deployment of a Total Electronic Emissions Shield capable of eliminating 100% of computer viruses stored or being transmitted by whatever medium...all that is required is actual production of the EMP vehicles and the political will to employ them
Political will should be accumulated by a "Reboot America" campaign overtly touting the benefits of a total cleansing of the internet, coupled with a false underground campaign rumoring that foriegn oil interests are criminally conspiring to deny the American public the benefits of an EMP event, because the price of oil would be reset automatically to the pre-Internet levels
http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/555544_504617649551762_122113877_n.jpg
>1) the Hash tag defense
While not perfect it is a sound first line<
What is that?
>>2) The rating system used by most torrent sites and similar sites.<<
Take them out too. Yeah that's right, screw Google.
>>3) File size changes<<
I'm talking scorched earth meltdown of the hardware. You can't change anything if the CPU is melted.
>>4) Whiteboarding<<
Not sure what that means but I feel certain enough destruction of hardware will solve that
>>5) Virus Scans<<
Already playing catchup, and I'm talking about Microsoft getting letters of marque to hire Bulgarian hackers to destroy wannabes.
>6) virtual settings<
Virtual setting: OFF
Effective cyber defenses and false addresses should be logged as proof of conspiracy justifying an audit of the server by qualified operatives. Meaning, a no-knock raid and physical destruction of the server and the wall behind it.
Do that often enough and we'd solve piracy. Maybe we'd take the global economy back to 1986...but hey, that was a very good year
booms "Eye of the Tiger" out his car stereo when he goes to pick up his date
authorize companies to hack on pirates and destroy their hardware with malware
problem solved
I'd agree that was harsh, but I guess I'll pile on TBO then kill myself later out of remorse.
![]()
Blind Mice Given Sight After Device Cracks Retinal Code
By Jeanna Smialek - Aug 13, 2012 12:00 PM PT
Blind mice had their vision restored with a device that helped diseased retinas send signals to the brain, according to a study that may lead to new prosthetic technology for millions of sight-impaired people.
Current devices are limited in the aid they provide to people with degenerative diseases of the retina, the part of the eye that converts light into electrical impulses to the brain. In research described today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, scientists cracked the code the retina uses to communicate with the brain.
Blind mice had their vision restored with a device that helped diseased retinas send signals to the brain. Above, a household mouse not part of the experiment. Photographer: Roger Jackman/Oxford Scientific
The technology moves prosthetics beyond bright light and high-contrast recognition and may be adopted for human use within a year or two, said Sheila Nirenberg, a neuroscientist at Weill Cornell Medical College in New York and the study
showgirls made naked women boring. quite an achievement
Glengarry Glen Ross...shows why we need women in the workplace...because without women that's how guys would talk to each other.
well if they'd accept American government, and our management...
oh
well
never mind then!
beat me then dances around like Not-Damien-Football-Williams-Cause-He-Was-Acquitted
huh guess he was subsequently convicted....so yeah banksy was like him
Imperial Forum → Posts by The Yell
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.