As I just noticed, Belgium's the only country that still competes for the medal in football ![]()
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by Wild Flower Soul
As I just noticed, Belgium's the only country that still competes for the medal in football ![]()
"I am going to expand the Atheist population in the US by illustrating the powers of reason to those Christians. Once they discover reason, and how it can enrich their lives, they will never return to Christianity."
Yes, I hope you succeed, but as I've noticed, there's nothing that can convert them.. You can never beat the "yes that's what god did to shed the true believers from the corrupted" in a rational way. I know a few ardent christians (well, 2), and whatever the discussion is about, evolution-theory, creationism, omnipotence, and so on. At the time you corner them with rational thoughts, they utter that one, and you can't rationally break that down..
"In USA we have a very behavioralist interpretation of political ideology--the ACT matters more than the strict interpretation or intent. Comes of having onyl 2 serious parties. "Leftist is as leftist does""
behavioralism has been discredited and abandoned for quite some time over here ![]()
That is complete bollocks.
People have the need for sex, denying that is going against your nature and causes a lot of frustration, but that doesn't mean you have to get a baby from it. It's simply not possible to only have reproductive sex. If that's really what you think: good luck lad, you're trying something what never worked throughout the entire history of mankind!
Sadly, apart from being superminds, they're not exactly superhero material ![]()
"You studied under Dr. Doom and the Avenger?"
None of them has anything to do with art though. Doom teaches Mongolian and Turkish-tribal (not the nation) history.
Doesn't proper welsh have more four l's in a row and such? ![]()
Notice how I disregard your post as total off topic ![]()
I'm no argent nationalist on any area. But I see the benefits of this "fogi" in all of those groups ![]()
"yeah, im rooting for us too:) and hoping it will happen, but i doubt it"
If they win against that african country, they're certain of a medal ![]()
The Spider Murphy Gang - Skandal in Sperrberzirk
"Erm not true"
What exactly?
All that you said are to be interpreted as measures to restart the economic growth again. It required governmental actions wich might be considered leftist-inspired, but the intentions were never leftist. Hitler wanted his economy to boost so that he had a robust economy that could support his international plans, not to make things better for the Germans. Leftist ideas don't equal a leftist government or ideals.
I was wondering how serious people take you when your bachelorpaper is heavily based on the works of a historian named "Sicking" and is reviewed by a professor named Doom. On top of that, I was educated for classical history by a man who was a suspect of a double homicide and whose name's "De Vreker" (wich translated in english means "the avenger")..
"Its the econ part that gets people confused. To flints defence, it had some extreme left aspects in it. To your defence alan, the social model was undoubtably extreme right. Now I generalise, hoping you all understand what I said, but I'm willing to explain it further."
It might have indeed, the Nazi party combined loads of different ideas that seemed incompatible, yet I think you can't really call the nazi economic policy as left. The heavy input of the government into economic activities was a general aspect in the whole of the western world at that time. The economy had collapsed and it required governmental input to recover, wich is indeed a leftist idea, but at that time, it was a survival-technique and liberalism was virtually dead. That way it's not necessarily leftist.
The Nazi-party denied any form of unions, wich of all is a leftist thing. It adopted corporatism, as it was suggested by right wing parties and the pope in the "Rerum Novarum"-encyclical. On top of that, people that were in favour of the Nazi-ideas were heavily against anything that was socialist.
"I totally understand what you said and agree with your analysis.
Hitler's social model is something I disagree with.
He had the Pope's blessing.
(which the Vatican vehementally denied after Germany won the war, until about the 1990's where they then admitted it was true but added a twist to it to justify their foolishness)"
Fascism doesn't have anything to do with the pope or catholicism. According to wiki, Fascism is:
"Fascism is a term used to describe authoritarian nationalist political ideologies or mass movements that are concerned with notions of cultural decline or decadence and seek to achieve a millenarian national rebirth by exalting the nation or race, and promoting cults of unity, strength and purity."
All that applies to the Nazi-party..
"What are the benefits of such a Union? I'm just to big a Nationalist I suppose."
A stronger union has every benefit. It makes a stronger economical field, probably too in international politics. It brings more freedom internally and so on.. Nationalism doesn't have to obstruct europeanism though. It can be combined ![]()
I feel European, then Belgian, then Flemish.
"He was no communist, but he was left of center for 100% sure."
Great evidence or argument flintsy!
Yet he prohibited unions, leftist organisations in general, and saw the Soviet Union as his main opponent and idiological negative. He didn't want to unify europe (let alone the world), but wanted his own people to expand over the whole of Europe. There's a difference of uniting everyone in a "nation of the working class" as the classic communists of those days wanted and expanding to the entire of europe so that your own people have it better.
"Hitler was more left than right by far, revisionism will not get you anything from me. "
You're clueless lad.
"Hitler is about where Obama is imo."
How does that go?
"He is finally moving to the center from the left!"
If McCain is a leftist, I wonder what in the name of God's ass you call right-wing?
Madrugada - On your side
The Belgians are doing quite well in football! Go us!!!
"Well I get two different answers from the both of them. My mom has a very traditional, love-centric view. By contrast, my sister has been sexually active her entire life and doesn't care."
Am I the only one who finds that somewhat strange?
"For example, in a primitive society, their women have more than one husband."
I wouldn't go that far and call call them primitive. But that's not what this thread is about.
In the Fulani tribe, a girl having sex with another man is the end of their marriage and is considered to be an error on the man's side, as it's his responsibility to keep his wife happy. They too have a very strong woman-based social structure.
"Pfui. You think you could go up to a medieval woman and ask for some nookie? You'd get stabbed fifty times by her male relatives and left with your dong in your mouth. Women were PROPERTY of a household, if not a husbands then a fathers. And that was true in Latin countries a lot longer than the Victorian era. Muslims have RETAINED those Christian values."
They were not. Women were able to divorce their husbands if it didn't work out, at least in several regions and could be rather independent (for this, look up some articles of Monique van Melkebeek, she usually writes in french). Prosititution was widely spread in the Middle Ages too. There were massive bathhouses (wich were usually owned by the church or nobility) to streetprostitutes. City governments tried to concentrate it in a particular area of the city, but were never succesful.
About the muslims, they have a complex history, and that one line doesn't cover it by far.
And you're right about the southern european countries, they did have a longer period of prudity, but it defenatly declined after WWII.
"Being very literal that is virginity, however we are talking about christianity and virginity, so purity and virginity are the same thing in this context."
Not really, the church, as I tried to explain was usually quite permissive in every day life, although they condemned sex before marriage in general and didn't approve of a lot of sexual acts in theory. Once a girl was engaged however, they were allowed to have sex, and when a lad broke the engagement, he was usually punished (humiliated) and sometimes he even had to pay a quite large compensation-fine. only in the 19th century that changed, only to dissappear again in the 20th century..
Imperial Forum → Posts by Wild Flower Soul
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.