226

(15 replies, posted in Politics)

So the American Right, egged on by the rising libertarians, wants to complain about the Militarization of Police.  I guess that is the New Right, that likes complaining about crap it will never change.

Police Departments are getting military surplus body armor, semiautomatic M4 carbines in 5.56mm, camoflauge uniforms, and armored trucks with firing slots and offroad suspension.

http://ww2.hdnux.com/photos/31/56/54/67 … 28x471.jpg

Personally I think it's great.  I'm from the old school that put National Guard in the streets.  And they shot people in 1992, because they were freaking stupid.

I am not a libertarian.  I think it is an ignorant, unAmerican philosophy of drug users and people who don't know US history. When I hear that "people don't lose their rights just because some people are committing crimes"  I am ready to scream.  Yes, when you are protesting, and somebody next to you throws a firebomb at police, you are either a witness or an accessory.  You do not have the right to stand there, illegally, protesting, and interfering with the arrest of a violent felon.

The Sheriff's Department, in their glorious war gear, are that "well-regulated militia" the 2nd Amendment is talking about.  They don't answer to Congress. They're local. They're temporary, in that they can be dismissed anytime.  They're not part of the armed forces of the national government.   They're doing the job that George Washington wanted them to do , that Andrew Jackson wanted them to do, that Abraham Lincoln wanted them to do: kick ass and take names.

Libertarians believe their ass cannot be kicked, their name cannot be taken.  This is unAmerican. 

That whole "People who want to trade liberty for security deserve neither" and "Better 10 guilty men go free than one innocent man be punished"  philosphy, to excuse looting and arson in a riot, is suicidal and unAmerican.  This is a country of the posse, the Vigilance Committee, of collective and open lynch justice when it really hits the fan.  We do not have to stand back and watch you burn it down.   We can, and will, shoot you.  We can pay the Sheriff to build a team to shoot you.

This former cop, Sunil Dutta says it well:

A teenager is fatally shot by a police officer; the police are accused of being bloodthirsty, trigger-happy murderers; riots erupt. This, we are led to believe, is the way of things in America.

It is also a terrible calumny; cops are not murderers. No officer goes out in the field wishing to shoot anyone, armed or unarmed. And while they’re unlikely to defend it quite as loudly during a time of national angst like this one, people who work in law enforcement know they are legally vested with the authority to detain suspects — an authority that must sometimes be enforced. Regardless of what happened with Mike Brown, in the overwhelming majority of cases it is not the cops, but the people they stop, who can prevent detentions from turning into tragedies.

Working the street, I can’t even count how many times I withstood curses, screaming tantrums, aggressive and menacing encroachments on my safety zone, and outright challenges to my authority. In the vast majority of such encounters, I was able to peacefully resolve the situation without using force. Cops deploy their training and their intuition creatively, and I wielded every trick in my arsenal, including verbal judo, humor, warnings and ostentatious displays of the lethal (and nonlethal) hardware resting in my duty belt. One time, for instance, my partner and I faced a belligerent man who had doused his car with gallons of gas and was about to create a firebomb at a busy mall filled with holiday shoppers. The potential for serious harm to the bystanders would have justified deadly force. Instead, I distracted him with a hook about his family and loved ones, and he disengaged without hurting anyone. Every day cops show similar restraint and resolve incidents that could easily end up in serious injuries or worse.

Sometimes, though, no amount of persuasion or warnings work on a belligerent person; that’s when cops have to use force, and the results can be tragic. We are still learning what transpired between Officer Darren Wilson and Brown, but in most cases it’s less ambiguous — and officers are rarely at fault. When they use force, they are defending their, or the public’s, safety.

Even though it might sound harsh and impolitic, here is the bottom line: if you don’t want to get shot, tased, pepper-sprayed, struck with a baton or thrown to the ground, just do what I tell you. Don’t argue with me, don’t call me names, don’t tell me that I can’t stop you, don’t say I’m a racist pig, don’t threaten that you’ll sue me and take away my badge. Don’t scream at me that you pay my salary, and don’t even think of aggressively walking towards me. Most field stops are complete in minutes. How difficult is it to cooperate for that long?


DON’T ARGUE WITH ME, DON’T CALL ME NAMES, DON’T TELL ME THAT I CAN’T STOP YOU, DON’T SAY I’M A RACIST PIG, DON’T THREATEN THAT YOU’LL SUE ME AND TAKE AWAY MY BADGE. DON’T SCREAM AT ME THAT YOU PAY MY SALARY, AND DON’T EVEN THINK OF AGGRESSIVELY WALKING TOWARDS ME.

I know it is scary for people to be stopped by cops. I also understand the anger and frustration if people believe they have been stopped unjustly or without a reason. I am aware that corrupt and bully cops exist. When it comes to police misconduct, I side with the ACLU: Having worked as an internal affairs investigator, I know that some officers engage in unprofessional and arrogant behavior; sometimes they behave like criminals themselves. I also believe every cop should use a body camera to record interactions with the community at all times. Every police car should have a video recorder. (This will prevent a situation like Mike Brown’s shooting, about which conflicting and self-serving statements allow people to believe what they want.) And you don’t have to submit to an illegal stop or search. You can refuse consent to search your car or home if there’s no warrant (though a pat-down is still allowed if there is cause for suspicion). Always ask the officer whether you are under detention or are free to leave. Unless the officer has a legal basis to stop and search you, he or she must let you go. Finally, cops are legally prohibited from using excessive force: The moment a suspect submits and stops resisting, the officers must cease use of force.

But if you believe (or know) that the cop stopping you is violating your rights or is acting like a bully, I guarantee that the situation will not become easier if you show your anger and resentment. Worse, initiating a physical confrontation is a sure recipe for getting hurt. Police are legally permitted to use deadly force when they assess a serious threat to their or someone else’s life. Save your anger for later, and channel it appropriately. Do what the officer tells you to and it will end safely for both of you. We have a justice system in which you are presumed innocent; if a cop can do his or her job unmolested, that system can run its course. Later, you can ask for a supervisor, lodge a complaint or contact civil rights organizations if you believe your rights were violated. Feel free to sue the police! Just don’t challenge a cop during a stop.

An average person cannot comprehend the risks and has no true understanding of a cop’s job. Hollywood and television stereotypes of the police are cartoons in which fearless super cops singlehandedly defeat dozens of thugs, shooting guns out of their hands. Real life is different. An average cop is always concerned with his or her safety and tries to control every encounter. That is how we are trained. While most citizens are courteous and law abiding, the subset of people we generally interact with everyday are not the genteel types. You don’t know what is in my mind when I stop you. Did I just get a radio call of a shooting moments ago? Am I looking for a murderer or an armed fugitive? For you, this might be a “simple” traffic stop, for me each traffic stop is a potentially dangerous encounter. Show some empathy for an officer’s safety concerns. Don’t make our job more difficult than it already is.

Community members deserve courtesy, respect and professionalism from their officers. Every person stopped by a cop should feel safe instead of feeling that their wellbeing is in jeopardy. Shouldn’t the community members extend the same courtesy to their officers and project that the officer’s safety is not threatened by their actions? http://www.washingtonpost.com/postevery … llenge-me/

Or else.

227

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

"The figure of the Kaiser is an illusion. The ruling-body of the German Empire was the "Bundesrat", where all Rulers of the states were assembled. The president of the Bundesrat had only the titel "German Emperor"."

Paul K. Massie goes into the details at length in "Dreadnought" but the Kaiser held a great deal of personal power in foriegn relations.  First, because he was outright monarch of Prussia, the largest German entity.  Secondly, because he had the whole military under his personal control.  Like some Brit said, there was one guy in Europe who could launch war by pushing a button, and it was the Kaiser.  The General Staff demanded war with France if Russia mobilized and the Kaiser - not the Bundesrat - ordered it so.

228

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

I know I saw it in John Keegan's "The First World War"

While America was being neutral and "too proud to fight", Woodrow Wilson asked both sides to write down their peace terms and give them to him, and the German terms were basically "You lose, we win, we keep what we took"

229

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

huh now I'm trying to find it on the internet.  I know it was in Keegan's history, but from what I'm seeing online, the Belgian occupation was formally said to be a separate question to be decided later blah blah blah wink wink-- in 1917.  I'll keep digging.

230

(5 replies, posted in Politics)

Obviously the solution is to invade Holland while dressed as Russians, and take over their power plant before they can stop whoring and fight you

dunno happened like 5 times but not since they moved to this format

I think there's a template option to make it look old-style

232

(5 replies, posted in Politics)

'Messuiers, we will tell them that any one of our reactors could also fail, because we build them for shit! And who will not believe? We are French!"

"Mon Dieu, it is formidable! The profits to be made through -refusing- to produce electricity through fission!"

233

(5 replies, posted in Politics)

PARIS, Aug 14 (Reuters) - Belgian energy company Electrabel said its Doel 4 nuclear reactor would stay offline at least until the end of this year after major damage to its turbine, with the cause confirmed as sabotage.

On Tuesday, Electrabel had said the plant would remain offline until Sept. 15 as it carried out repairs and investigated an oil leak that forced its closure on Aug. 5. Its French parent company GDF Suez confirmed the closure was due to sabotage.

The shutdown of Doel 4's nearly 1 gigawatt (GW) of electricity generating capacity as well as closures of two other reactors (Doel 3 and Tihange 2) or months because of cracks in steel reactor casings adds up to just over 3 GW of Belgian nuclear capacity that is offline, more than half of the total.

The latest closure will put further pressure on the earnings of GDF Suez, which warned last month that the closure of the first two Belgian plants would push its 2014 group net recurring income to the lower end of its forecast range of 3.3 billion to 3.7 billion euros.

The French company said those outages would have an impact of about 40 million euros per month on net recurring income.

Electrabel said on Thursday the Doel 4 reactor had shut automatically on Aug. 5 following an oil leak in its steam turbine in the non-nuclear part of the plant. The firm said the leak had caused major damage to the turbine's high-pressure section.

"Based on this partial analysis, Doel 4 will certainly not be available before Dec. 31, 2014," Electrabel said.

Once the low-pressure parts of the turbine have been opened and examined, Electrabel will update its estimate of how long the repair work will take.

Energy experts have raised the spectre of possible blackouts this winter and say Belgium will have to boost interconnection capacity with neighbouring countries to prevent power shortages.

A GDF Suez spokesman confirmed Belgian press reports about suspicion of sabotage.

"There was an intentional manipulation," he said, adding that somebody had tampered with the system used for emptying oil from the Alstom-made turbine.

He said no outsiders had penetrated into the plant but declined to say whether an employee could have purposely caused the leak, as has been reported in some Belgian media.

He said Electrabel had filed a complaint and that the Belgian police had started an investigation.

GDF Suez shares close 0.6 percent higher on Thursday, slightly outperforming the broader market.

AGEING REACTORS

Doel 4 is the youngest of four reactors at the Doel nuclear plant, 20 km north of Antwerp, Belgium's second-biggest city. The country has three more reactors in Tihange, 25 km southwest of the city of Liege.

Doel 1 and 2, which came on line in 1975, are set to close in 2015. Tihange 1, which also started operation in 1975 and was designed to last 30 years, got a 10-year extension till 2015.

The two closed reactors Doel 3 and Tihange 2 were connected to the grid in 1982 and 1983. Doel 4 and Tihange 3, which came on line in 1985, were operating normally until the closure of Doel 4 last week.

In Britain, EDF Energy, owned by France's EDF, took three of its nuclear reactors offline for inspection on Monday after finding a defect in a reactor of a similar design.

The problems of the two French utilities with their reactors abroad may serve as a warning of possible generic flaws that could appear in EDF's ageing nuclear park at home.

With 58 reactors in 19 nuclear plants, France is the world's most nuclear-dependent country, relying on it for nearly three quarters of its power.

All of its plants are of the same basic Pressurised Water Reactor design, which means that a flaw discovered in one of EDF's reactors could force the closure of others.

French nuclear regulator ASN has repeatedly warned policy-makers that they should make room for additional supply in case a fault at one reactor prompted the precautionary closure of more than a dozen reactors. (Additional reporting by Michel Rose; Editing by Andrew Callus and Jane Baird)

The old forums got hacked so this is the most secure version

wb

is this football or soccer?

236

(3 replies, posted in Feedback)

I can't blame the developers

In all the blah about the Computer Age we never figured consumers would become enamored of LESS CAPABLE HARDWARE

237

(55 replies, posted in Politics)

http://dailycaller.com/2014/08/11/repor … ing-wrong/

Basically he sets up a home "global warming" test that actually measures how any denser gas will retain heat, rather than reflecting how greenhouse gases react to solar radiation.

But it's politically irrelevant, so, it remains in use.

238

(4 replies, posted in Feedback)

let him play with his feet for a change

239

(4 replies, posted in General)

are these the children of your other dog?

240

(2 replies, posted in General)

This forum is like the 5th incarnation, and we had to switch once because people were posting evil pictures

241

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

hey it helped ours twice

242

(14 replies, posted in General)

that's a funny pic of DiCaprio

243

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

In hindsight always...

244

(0 replies, posted in Politics)

Disease eradication efforts[edit]
The Carter Center began spearheading the campaign to eradicate Guinea worm disease worldwide in 1986. At the time, there were about 3.5 million annual cases of the disease in 20 countries in Africa and Asia. In 2013, there were 148 reported cases in four countries: South Sudan, Chad, Mali, and Ethiopia.[25] Guinea worm disease is poised to be the first parasitic disease to be eradicated and the only disease to be eradicated without the use of vaccines or drugs.

Within affected countries, the Center reinforces existing disease eradication programs by providing technical and financial assistance, as well as logistics and tools, such as donated filter cloth material, larvicide, and medical kits.[26]

The International Task Force for Disease Eradication has been based at The Carter Center since its formation in 1988. The group has reviewed more than 100 infectious diseases and identified six as potentially eradicable – dracunculiasis, poliomyelitis, mumps, rubella, lymphatic filariasis, and cysticercosis.[27] 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carter_Center


Damn...Jimmy Carter goes after your kids until your whole species is gone yikes

245

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

I would have thought to have 100% Belgian participation

although given what they post about their politics, they probably can't agree on this one either

246

(2 replies, posted in General)

before that crazy Dutch scientist makes an aerosol form of Ebola?  You know he wants to

247

(14 replies, posted in General)

but she said it was not for me sad

I mean I expect the chinese government to block me, but damn your gf is strict

248

(6 replies, posted in General)

true

we need a cardboard box capable of exiting earth's atmosphere

nvm @ reentry

249

(6 replies, posted in General)

Nasa is a major player in space science, so when a team from the agency this week presents evidence that "impossible" microwave thrusters seem to work, something strange is definitely going on. Either the results are completely wrong, or Nasa has confirmed a major breakthrough in space propulsion.

British scientist Roger Shawyer has been trying to interest people in his EmDrive for some years through his company SPR Ltd. Shawyer claims the EmDrive converts electric power into thrust, without the need for any propellant by bouncing microwaves around in a closed container. He has built a number of demonstration systems, but critics reject his relativity-based theory and insist that, according to the law of conservation of momentum, it cannot work.

According to good scientific practice, an independent third party needed to replicate Shawyer's results. As Wired.co.uk reported, this happened last year when a Chinese team built its own EmDrive and confirmed that it produced 720 mN (about 72 grams) of thrust, enough for a practical satellite thruster. Such a thruster could be powered by solar electricity, eliminating the need for the supply of propellant that occupies up to half the launch mass of many satellites. The Chinese work attracted little attention; it seems that nobody in the West believed in it.

However, a US scientist, Guido Fetta, has built his own propellant-less microwave thruster, and managed to persuade Nasa to test it out. The test results were presented on July 30 at the 50th Joint Propulsion Conference in Cleveland, Ohio. Astonishingly enough, they are positive.

http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/201 … pace-drive

250

(10 replies, posted in Community)

Will you name him "Sjoerd"?