we've only had me, barby, maxi, hon and DS do PvC havent we?
but i think one per day is a little unrealistic...

Perhaps they weren't playing for the win though?

awexome, i havent been back enough to be able to recognise many of the bankers, which is why i didnt mention them i'm afraid

i'm very very confused now. i thought whateverr = alena = 420

49's pic is better

and i keep saying it, its july not june!

2249 seem to have the right sort of idea...

maxi, its someone elses turn, i've done more than anyone else i think? or equal, cant rmemeber if hon did one or two...

it has
i think my last pvc killed it

> MaxiJazz wrote:

> When a family[s] has a blatant disregard for the terms of the NAP set down and agreed upon by all families involved then the NAP can be voided.

= perfectly legitimate.

So presumable it would be perfectly legitimate for me to voidmy nap with your allies then?

PErhaps justified would have been a better choice of words? Even then that's still subjective thought. Just because you don't agree with the decision to void doesn't mean you shouldn't accept that it was a pretty shrewd move on their part, surely?

> Timmyville wrote:

> Bullet, you threatened me. I really don't respond well to threats. The planets were passed over, it just so happened that there were several people on vacation the week you messaged me, hence the reason for the delay. Plus I wasn't ignoring you, PLUS the 40 some odd planets were ultimately passed.

There is still one that hasn't been. And it wasn't a threat, I was pointing out that others among us would not have been so patient. Such as yourself in my position by the looks of it.
I never said you were ignoring me, it was just more of a hassle to take those planets back that it should have been.