51

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

So we werent in a terrible position? Having no savings no income and #2 and #1 fam warring us tongue?

52

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

If you are referring to 41 and 38 there is a nap in place that forces us to pay the price it took to get it. We were in a terrible position with 38 and 46 at war with us at the same time, and had no choice.

53

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

ofcourse its not fd, that would be and IA

54

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

Empire what your family is claiming regarding market aid and border agreement is just false, thats not debateable.

How we draw the line on success, dishonesty and vulturing is debateable and thats what im questioning

55

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

I dont think u guys really understand that im just trolling you, so ill just say it outright...

56

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

Correcting spelling, nice argument there impire, running out of substance hehe?

I never said hellz demanded planets from me, i beat him to it by making an offer i was confident he would accept without asking for more.


In the end its what you do and not what you say that defines you, and i can walk with my back straight and say that we in 41 tried something different this round, and made it work.

57

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

read my message please remo i know u can do it

58

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

> Impire wrote:

> Few things.


41 tried to BOR raid us after breaking agreements with one of our vice leaders.  Personally I'd prefer to war them at that time, but as a leader its not wise to sacrifice your family in expo phase due to your ego (take lessons 41).   

- There was no such agreement, your leader refused to sign anything


41 approached several families throughout the round (40) asking them to attack us or asking for market aid (46,38) at several points during the round. 

  - This is outright lies, ive allready asked Talic to prove this and he could not supply anything more than a joking message i sent him taken out of context.

41 had no respect for prior families that went to war (47 and 40 cancellation war they told them it was their target they planned to they could screw off regardless of their cancellations) - 47 and 40 both agreed that this was a weird situation in where 40 tried to ninja 47s war with 41. In the end it turned out as intended, 41 vs 47 is a nice and even war.


Your family has had 2 days since the 38 war ended (I talked to them and know the truth) plus a 3 day nap cancellation period. 5 days prep time for a war.  What more do you want, 10 days? Vulturing has been considered attacking during a war, or a few days after it not usually is it considered that 5 days after a NAP is already in place.

- You have saved for maybe 14 days straight, would be nice to give us atleast 5 yes. As for the difinition of a vulture:

noun
1.
any of several large, primarily carrion-eating Old World birds of prey of the family Accipitridae, often having a naked head and less powerful feet than those of the related hawks and eagles.
2.
any of several superficially similar New World birds of the family Cathartidae, as the turkey vulture.
3.
a person or thing that preys, especially greedily or unscrupulously: That vulture would sell out his best friend.




Your family deserves zero respect from us and will get none.  Lots of early fighting put you with lots of NAP's, poor diplomacy situations and huge ego's which was your main weakness.  Your egos are so huge rather than fighting like a man you  opt to give your planets to 38.  Real leaders never give up on their fam's and certainly don't self destruct their own families so that they don't bruise egos. 

- We have not opted to give our planets to 38. WHen you guys cancelled on us before we were napped to 38 we were put in an awkward position. We needed to peace with them ASAP, and with them knowing this, they could demand an insane amount of planets from us, we had no choice but to accept. Your fam has statted repeatedly you will take us down to 500 planets, as the leader of the fam its my duty to make sure we do as well as possible, and thats what im doing.

59

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

Colo is good at savings butts, but not so much at winning rounds.

60

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

sorry i know my math!

61

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

wrong ocho, u cant divide by zero the dividing by (x-y) isnt valid

62

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

Mustve been such a boring round for u guys then tongue 4 weeks of infrawhoring and farming just to get the most failed war ever tongue

63

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

Strong words scorp lol

64

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

Remo no need to try wordtrickery to appear smart...

We have fought two major and even wars tis round, vs 47 and vs 38. Both times we were outsaved but ended up doing very well.

The war you planned against us never was a proper war, as your fam has maybe 14 days of savings while we are straight out of a war, and you know it. Its just vulturing

65

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

So you admit then that you havent fought a single decent war this round. Thank you smile

66

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

You are completely missing the ball here remo...

When the #2 fam in a round hasnt fought a single decent war the whole round, thats when i call them out.

67

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

You can say what you want Remo, everyones definition changes it seems. Our definition of success this round was to get our bold strategy to work. Imo it did work, but the way the game is played atm does not really suit it, so ultimately you are better off just infrabooming and farming like you guys did.

68

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

portgas when u guys cancelled on us i had to nap 38 imidiately, and had to make them an offer so good they couldnt refuse.

69

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

Did i say we won last round in that message? I said we were #1, and we were, by nw and by score and by size for 90% of the round until some of the famlies we had beaten speeded up their farming towards the end wink.

You say we violated that agreement, but thats incorrect, there was no such agreement active, we tried to make a new one with you, but you refused. End fo discussion.

If u cant understand basic sarcasm, then i will start flagging posts for you so its easier to understand.

And yes, we did play hardball early round, and naturally that costs eco, thus we started fighting you, and did so successfully, and once again stop blaming the agreement you claim was in place.

We wont agree on this it seems, so lets just leave it, we wil fight u and prove you have nothing on us smile

70

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

Talic, it was a deliberate call, we wanted to play this way to see how it would work. Keep in mind that my fam has been #1 the last 4 consecutive rounds using pop banking strategy. I was ready for something else. When some of our players had to leave mid round we had to change strategy, and might i add quite successfully. We ended up fighting a war with 38 where we were on par with them.

If the rest of the fam hadnt been sitting booming while we were fighting, we wouldve won the round im pretty sure, but in the end we ended up unable to fight #1 and #2 fam within 5 days, as any other fam in the galaxy would be.

71

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

We played the round hardcore talic, we have fought every other top fam successfully and we played hardball early round, we went no poppers when everyone else was infrabooming, and we made some action in the game, while ur fam was advocating napping and booming, so dont come talk here about how poeple need to play differently to save the game. Cause we were the fresh breath of air this round, not your family wink.

Why anyone would work with bara? Lord only knows why, i can only see that you are tongue. For christ sakes, lighten up, you really think i was seriously accusing you for working with bara?

72

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

How nice of 46 to work with 48 to kill us sad

Our relations with 6748 have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 47 weeks.

73

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

You seem to be changing the definition more than anyone tho middle and you keep trying to spread the false rumor that 41 was violating any agreement we had, or that we wanted to cancel on you early. Its just BS and u wont convince anyone with it. Im sorry

74

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

Remo, because we made several naps like that, because we dont know what fams will survive and wich wont. We wanted a fun EOR war, and we got one, with 38. Now 46 wanna vulture us while we are down because they somehow feel it would prove something. I guess they are still hurt by getting mangled by us earlier in the round, using the border agreement as a fake excuse. They know very well they had many offers of nap wich they refused to accept, and were gearing up to war us when we called their bluff.

75

(313 replies, posted in Universal News)

Whats the bankers making?