the fam that cancels a tick to late wins ![]()
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by Matrix
the fam that cancels a tick to late wins ![]()
Our planet x was attacked by A Dutch Hoe of family 5517. Our defending forces fought bravely but I am sorry to say that they after a long bloody fight had to flee the planet.
why me X(
no its just the stripes on my shirt that make us look fat X(
AA war plan:
lie to make a fam half your nw believe you wont hit them
get 300 shared
take them
raid someone but leave him his shared with your bankers
wonder why your bankers lose planets
brag
my war plans are much better:
check if parrot is in my allies fam
kill allies
brag
i know you enjoyed it Parrot ![]()
***'* **** *** Dpenguins!
Gurney you know since attacking was possible we did share with 10
our attackers where in systems full with bankers of 10.. and the other way around
and we never took a planet of 10
and 10 never took a planet of us..
but yeah aa is probatly right and we had no agreement.... lol just some strange coincidence that 10 grabed on every other non naped fam
expect us
just wonder what he would have said when we would have hit him
already can imagine his post ![]()
though good plan by aa... if we would have hit each others as attacking was possible this would have been about 30 shared or so..
now it was about 300+ so his lie gets him 300+ easy planets
i know that you love me darling
106 from #5510
9 from #5517
215 to #5510
50 to #5517
go 17 ![]()
and dam good plan to raid me little resourcer but not to take the 60 shared i had with your bankers...
now leave me alone X(
and aa **** ***
Week 43, 19Reply Save
Political Advisor
'We are prevented from breaking alliances this round by the rules of the intergalactic moderators.'
Signed, Jethro of TheSpoonGoon (#5347)
we tried to drop them 4 years ago...didn't work ![]()
read nap terms in your forum? ![]()
its an alliance nap ![]()
but they managed to write your fam cancelatione msg at a different tick as ours...
also 60 didn't write cancelatione msg as far as i know?
seriously 42 and 60 should start reading nap terms..
also wonder if they deportal there shared in our core
what we get nuked by them too?
lol
you should have told me earlier X(
"ps matrix, the link you posted in the other thread, was not this war. read again ;P We had to use actual war reserves on 69, as they cansled Nap. So results aint entirely your fams proffits wink"
oh the 30 mil nw you jumped vs my fam then was what then?
you actuall jumped less nw vs 69 as vs us ![]()
btw psas in your fam should have stationed his fighters... 4 mil gone
you aren't that guy or? ![]()
and spam lost all his ground earlier
actuall atm its 69, 74 vs 66 and 66, 76 vs 74 since 76 and 69 are naped
someone managed to lose all his ground ![]()
just for the record 76 is helping 66 ![]()
since 66 claimed a 2 vs 1
THE FAMILY NEWS FOR YEAR 20
----------------------------
----------------
- CAPTURES -
----------------
175 planet(s) captured by Lays Limon (80 %) (101 retakes).
98 planet(s) captured by LaYs LiGhT (61 %) (58 retakes).
35 planet(s) captured by Lays Whisky (57 %) (34 retakes).
-------------------
308 from #5066
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 308 times. 1 families and 140 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 45 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 95.
----------------
- BLOW-UPS -
----------------
73 enemy planet(s) blown up by LaYs LiGhT
2 planet(s) from Lays Limon have been blown up.
---------------
- DEFEATS -
---------------
203 planet(s) lost by Lays Limon
105 planet(s) lost by LaYs LiGhT
30 planet(s) lost by Lays Whisky
16 planet(s) lost by Lays XtraFat
-------------------
351 to #5066
3 to #5072
THE FAMILY NEWS FOR YEAR 21
----------------------------
----------------
- CAPTURES -
----------------
193 planet(s) captured by Lays Limon (83 %) (133 retakes).
63 planet(s) captured by LaYs LiGhT (60 %) (30 retakes).
13 planet(s) captured by Lays Whisky (57 %) (9 retakes).
-------------------
269 from #5066
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 269 times. 1 families and 124 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 57 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 67.
----------------
- BLOW-UPS -
----------------
34 enemy planet(s) blown up by LaYs LiGhT
5 planet(s) from TYMO have been blown up.
2 planet(s) from Lays Limon have been blown up.
---------------
- DEFEATS -
---------------
173 planet(s) lost by Lays Limon
63 planet(s) lost by LaYs LiGhT
12 planet(s) lost by Lays Whisky
2 planet(s) lost by Lays XtraFat
-------------------
249 to #5066
1 to #5069
THE FAMILY NEWS FOR YEAR 22
----------------------------
-------------------
----------------
- CAPTURES -
----------------
126 planet(s) captured by Lays Limon (85 %) (83 retakes).
83 planet(s) captured by TYMO (69 %).
53 planet(s) captured by LaYs LiGhT (55 %) (21 retakes).
7 planet(s) captured by Lays Whisky (47 %) (2 retakes).
2 planet(s) captured by Lays Classic (50 %) (2 retakes).
-------------------
271 from #5066
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 271 times. 1 families and 181 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 161 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 20.
----------------
- BLOW-UPS -
----------------
20 enemy planet(s) blown up by LaYs LiGhT
9 planet(s) from TYMO have been blown up.
5 planet(s) from Lays Limon have been blown up.
---------------
- DEFEATS -
---------------
96 planet(s) lost by Lays Limon
31 planet(s) lost by LaYs LiGhT
7 planet(s) lost by Lays Whisky
2 planet(s) lost by Lays Classic
-------------------
136 to #5066
-------------------
We have been beaten 136 times. 1 families and 70 planets involved.
We actually lost 23 planet(s) in total. At least we were able to retake 47.
we up 163 planets atm ![]()
/me bows bevor the legend
"we didn't use all savings and you guys also had 1.5 bil saved....."
if you think so...
hmmm sounds like arganon created some multies to form a fam ![]()
i just said that because the names sound almost the same...
i might be totally wrong... ![]()
still go 73!
kill 62 ![]()
"And I lose more figs to them."
and thats why i don't get why people still think they can beat people with less fighters....
and why 2 people try to fighterun each other... only 1 can win... the other ALWAYS loses more fighters... if he hits the other one or if he gets hit...
is impossible that 2 people hit each other and both win the air war depeding who attacks
fighters = soldiers of the air.... by defending you always lose less and kill more fighters as by attacking
Imperial Forum → Posts by Matrix
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.