nah, we're actually enjoying it and dragonsoul, one attacker having some fun can hardly be called 'hitting your fam'

luster, there are these funny signs on your keyboard called dots and commas .... use m btw, we love you too, a real lot even, and you know how we prefer to express those feelings ... so bend over and lube up

geeze i disagree with tensai, lets have MORE vultures ... chances are they'll start fighting each other over the spoils, considering how many there are allready

today he (arganon) managed to accuse us (91) of vulturing. So yes, we kicked him out of a system. Still begs the question how we were able to hit him since they are way below 35% of our nw ... unless someone that isnt all too bright attacked us first, and then, when we retake, starts yelling 'vultures' just a funny story ...

i can confirm that, we did some tests years ago with peeps with exactly same number of planets, and took their planets with guys with exactly same number of planets, one was marked inactive, other wasnt ... result was exactly the same.

i would tend to disagree ... nap stated that, in case of 2vs1 with your allies, nap would be voided. It did not state that it then gave you the !option! to void it, nor that you could cancel in a lower timeframe, just that it would be void. According to the other thread (91 vs 89) your allies confirmed a 2vs1. Thus, the nap is void. A voided nap does not exist anymore. How can you break a nap that doesnt exist? Insofar the legal mumbojumbo.

I wont say it was a nice thing to do, but it WAS, according to nap conditions, correct. We have been expecting you guys to hit us with all you have for days now, and wouldnt have complained if you did. Ah well, no matter the circumstances ... have a good one.

Though you are kinda mistaken on people in 91 being 'new' (2 mods, one pre-beta, 2 others with 10y experience etc), and remo being here (he's in 04), i agree that it IS a fun fam to be in The core group has been together for a couple rounds now and has a ton of fun together, and we try to make it as welcoming for the others as we can. Honestly, though we dont do bad, we barely care if we end first or not, we're having a heap of fun and that's what playing games is all about, isnt it ?

erm ... isnt this discussion quite useless?
-score measures consistency of a fam's prowess (i do agree on the fact that deletions are nefarious for this way of measuring though - on the other hand, getting people involved and active is yet another job of a leader ...)
-size measures their agressiveness
-networth measures their economic power
All 3 are indicative of how good a fam is doing, and winning in any area at eor is worthy of respect. Only when a fam gets at least 2 out of 3 at eor, they can truly claim to be the victor.

leave the poor boobies alone, them birds have done nothing wrong

Leave Aleph be ... he's awesome ! Aleph for president !

since when does 'play market' mean 'play with yourself while looking in a mirror'?

is it just me or are the Galactic Events going haywire again?