2,726

(287 replies, posted in Politics)

Just like was pointed our earlier, evolution has nothing to do with how life started, it has to do with how life EVOLVED, thus the name evolution.

Science is based on findings, research and investigation.
Religion is based on ancient scripture

The two of them cannot be compared, one is about search for evidence, the other is about obidience to the ancient scruptures. Please do not try to compare them.

Creatonism has no evidence other than holy scripture, nor is there any attempts to get these proofs.

Evolution was based on the findings and theory of Charles Darwin, and has later been strengtherned and supported by numerous findings and conducted researches.

["Yes, the bible does say that god created the world in 7 days. But you do not have to interpret it that way. Peronsally i beleive god created the universe, not the big bang, and then he makes a system where strong creatures live and weak creatures die out"[

There you confirm my statement in the previous post, you do not take the theory as it was made up by the writers of the ancient scripture, you alter it to fit your personal belief. Thus Creationism is nothing solid, it is a personal belief, differing grately from person to person, and is not comparative to science at all.

To be honest there is no need to discuss Evolutionisme vs. Creationism, because the real debate is between Religion or SCience, ancient fairytales or common send and search of knowledge.

2,727

(37 replies, posted in Politics)

BW, cartellisation can be very profitable, as OPEC has proved the last couppl eof decades or so.

For me as a bikeriding norwegian, high oilprices is also good to be honest. Both for the enviroment because it reduces consumption, but also because the elasticity of oil demand is such that it also increases Norwegian revenues wink

2,728

(287 replies, posted in Politics)

Point remains,

Science is search of truth and understanding
Religion is believing what was made up milleniums ago

2,729

(287 replies, posted in Politics)

See thats what i mean, when Red-Rooster is faced with the argument than Evolution is not about how life began, but how life evolved over millions-billions of years, he alters the discussion to fit his belief. He takes bits and pieces of Creationism to believe, and disregards a few things because they can be disproved, like earths age, or that we werent all created as we are today.. Hypocracy. If you are going to believe a fairytale made up 2000 years ago, atleast believe the whole story, afterall thoose men with great imagination is the only base of the theory

[email protected] contact me by mail or add to msn, if i dont know you i wont draft you

2,731

(287 replies, posted in Politics)

the way esa is reasoning is why you can never disprove creationism, because they will go into denial and twist around words etc, and if you get them stuck they can always say "thats how god made it"

Mankind is figuring out more and more of natures mysteries each day, and we are getting closer to where it all began aswell, just think of CERN.

We can only hope that more and more ppl listen to reason rather than fairytales as time goes by smile

2,732

(287 replies, posted in Politics)

Red-Rooster thats wrong, there is countless research, darwin was jsut the frist

2,733

(287 replies, posted in Politics)

Red-Rooster

Creatinisme comes from the christian religion, no denying that.

With no other proof than holy scripture... Therefor any other information will just be your own imagination, not a result of countless researches etc

2,734

(287 replies, posted in Politics)

So you do not believe in the complete version of christian criationism? As it is worded in the bible? You alter it to fit half science half religion

2,735

(287 replies, posted in Politics)

Red_rooster

nice way of evading my question....

please answer the question:

How old do you think the world is, in exact years..

2,736

(287 replies, posted in Politics)

http://www.allaboutcreation.org

OMG read some of that site lol, i specially recommend the one about the dinosaurs

I almost peed my pants from laughing at their statements and arguments lol. Every single sentence contains a lie of some sort, and non of their arguments live up to any standards concerning validity and normal means of documentation lo. Increadibly entertaining, but also disturbing to know that a few wackoes actually believe this :S

2,737

(287 replies, posted in Politics)

Red_rooster youre obviously not understanding evolution..

Also i have a question for you as a creationist:

Do you disregard/choose to ignore all the DOCUMENTED findings of older creatures, dinosaurs, early mamals, early primates etc?

2,738

(37 replies, posted in Politics)

good fer them

2,739

(10 replies, posted in Politics)

its th' way o' th' media nowadays tho, whatever they can blow into th' biggest catasrophe becomes th' world focus

with split personalities it is

2,741

(32 replies, posted in Strategy)

can i also get some copies of the following similar literature

IC Deaths book on how to keep naps

PP_s book on makong short posts

Flints book on being mentally stable

George W. Bushs book on how to run a succsessfull economy

2,742

(82 replies, posted in Politics)

Norwegian

Conservative/liberal
Economy Bachelor finished this spring
I think the tole of government is working very well in the scandinavian countries, altho i think we should reduce it a bit to make ends meet also in the future and stimulate more labour and initiative

2,743

(5 replies, posted in Politics)

Einstein: Security guard and self proclaim mathwizz. Has clear social and psycological issues. His child and the mother both left him. Recently entered politics on local level. Gotten blocked in IC for ingame harassment and verbal abuse. Rightwinger. Fail to see even the most logical argumetn against him. Ignorant and delusional. Spammer

Blackwing: Reagan conservative and patriot. Found of militaristic approach. Understands economy and can back up his arguments. Like most posters he is very biased, but atleast he is honest about it.

The Yell: Voted once the best political poster, this man posts how he wants, and he never will post unsupported. He is a Conservative of Reagan style, and I think he has libertarian tendancies tongue, more balanced than his republican friends.

Decimus: Inteligent but extreme, rarely to be taken serious, and most likely only out to troll and get others tempers up. Entertaining read tho. Crazy finnish bastard wink.


Wild Foolish Soul: Forum Moderator and european leftwing modeerate. Often brings a wider perspective to the table, but is easily entangled into the trolling and ranting of american extreme rightwings.


Fokker: Socialist, bringing interesting discussion to a normally rightwing forum.


Elysian Thebes: Extreme christian conservatist from europe, usually found closer to his american likes.

Newb. Spammer, often tought to be einstein in disquise

Just thought we needed someone without lies in it

2,744

(29 replies, posted in Politics)

Oil and bases in middle east

we shoud excempt politics forum from this madness

With all the attacks Obama has gotten against him that are irrelevant politically, i dont see why you mock the media for focusing on Palins familiy and backround

Even more voted against him tho

2,748

(35 replies, posted in Politics)

What ppl dont see is that a system that gives more ppl teh chance of education etc, its not only charity, its about investment in human captial. And creating a stable and safe society...

Scandinavian countries have applied this very well, in contridiction to states that have been less sucsessfull, say US and UK

2,749

(125 replies, posted in Politics)

The man who shot will serve prisontime or possible death penalty if they manae to track him down.

This is nothing else than a murder, so dont treat it as.

Sure the murderer was provoked, but none the less he shot to kill and shall/will be punished thereafter

lol that statisticss doesnt sow a thing lol